 |
|
|
by Scott A. Posted Tue August 11, 2009 @ 9:18 PM
|
|
|
See what happens when an eight-year-old is allowed to comment on PFB? hehe
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by franese Posted Tue August 11, 2009 @ 7:21 AM
|
|
|
Never thought this would have so many comments. My issue in writing this is not with the writer....it's with the TOS not being applied fairly. It started with the infamous KT and now this....
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
o my n/t
by PepperElf Fri August 14, 2009 @ 12:22 AM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Nate. Posted Sun August 9, 2009 @ 3:39 PM
|
|
|
How do we know the 8-year old ever came to PlanetFeedback?
Maybe he wrote the letter by hand or on a word processing program, and his mom or whomever Debra R. might be chose PlanetFeedback as the means to send such letter.
If the account is in the name of someone who is eligible for membership, and under their supervision, someone ineligible send a letter, is it that big of a deal?
I think the 13 and up rule is a result of law as previously mentioned. This is not necessarily a "rule", but a requirement for anyone collecting personal information online such as names and addresses. It is not PFB specific. All websites have this same rule.
My thought is that since the TOS also serves a legal purpose, this section was likely added to be in legal compliance and to avoid any issues that may arise.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Correct
by Nate. Sun August 9, 2009 @ 9:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Nate. Posted Sat August 8, 2009 @ 9:25 PM
|
|
|
To the people below -
I think this part of the TOS is a legal issue - collecting information from users under the age of 13 is governed by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.
I got the impression that it was under a parent's account as well.
I don't think moaning about the 13+ rule is apples to apples with commenting rules. One is site policy and the other one is law governed by the FTC.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Perhaps the TOS should be revised. Many kids of the age of that letter writer have been online for a few years and surely this site provides a communication tool that kids can use as well as adults.
If this is done to protect kids: I feel that the level of moderation on this provides a much safer environment for a young person to interact with adults than other websites. If any conversation were to get inappropriate, it likely would get dealt with promptly.
I just don't think using this site provides much risk to kids, and I think kids have a lot to offer a site like this.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
lol no.
by PepperElf Mon August 10, 2009 @ 12:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Yes, our TOS does require users be at least 13 years old. In this case we made an exception for the following reasons:
1. Every indication is that the 8 year was using an adult account, most likely a relative.
2. It was a great letter. We are happy to provide a way for this young person to offer feedback.
He has written two letters so far. If this person continues to write letters then we will certainly take another look at the situation however we're not particularly worried about it at the moment.
Thanks for helping make sure folks use our site properly!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
You do
by Donno Sat August 8, 2009 @ 10:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Good Eye, didnt catch that.
Wonder what will happen?!?!?! Hmmmmmm
Good Day
Reply
|
|
|
|