|
|
Washer Warranty Fiasco
Posted Mon January 22, 2007 10:13 am, by brady d. written to Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
I don't even know where to begin. I guess it was about 5 weeks ago when my washer broke. I called your company and found out I still had a warranty on my washer, I was happy to say the least. My happiness with your company was very short lived. About a week later I had someone out to fix my washer. He needed a part and told me when the part arrived I would get a call to set up an appoinment. About a week later I got the part and he came out to fix the washer. No sooner did he leave after tellling me it was fixed that I did my first load of laundry and the washer was worse than when he started. I got back on the phone and called to get another repair man out. I was sent to a totally different location than the first time I called but they told me it would be about 5 days untill they could get someone out to see me. Again he came out but this time he told me that the first guy put the part in wrong and that he needed another part. Again wait a week to 10 days to get a part and he would be back out to put it in. Well that is the point we are at now. I called today and they told me saturday was the day I would be getting the service to put the latest part in. Well Lets just say this has not ben an easy experiance and I would just like to share some of the phone numbers for your company I have aquired over the last 5 weeks. 203-929-9004,1800-549-4505,1800-827-6655,1800-927-7836, 203-937-4425,180-469-4663,631-435-1387. I have called each of these phone numbers at least 1 time and sometimes up to 4-5 times. I have been disconnected about 3 times and just given the run around to many times to count. I am at my wits end and would like this situation to go away.
Either refund me the amount I spent on the worhtless warranty and reimburse me fo all the quartes and gas I have spent going back and forth to the laundry mat the last 5 weeks. Or give me a washer that works. I thinks 5 weeks is plenty of time to have a washer fixed and I am not being unreasonable at this time.
Pat Jeanette
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 49 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
by toniacop Posted Tue January 23, 2007 @ 2:51 PM
|
|
|
I feel your anger. I would be very upset. With four people in my household I would hate to have to go on the outside to wash and dry clothes. It is a pain. I hope they fix your washer soon.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by tea_granny Posted Tue January 23, 2007 @ 4:19 AM
|
|
|
I am so sorry that you are having this problem, and I really hope the company does something soon.
To address some of the comments below, it's no wonder this person came out defensively. She has a legitimate complaint, and she has been given the runaround. She opted to share the letter to warn others of the poor warranty service by this company, and has pretty much been slapped in the face for her efforts by having her letter picked apart, rather than have people say, "Wow. That sucks and I hope that company smartens up soon."
After having come through a similar phone circus hell with a different company, I can completely sympathize with the fact that this letter writer seems angry. Frustration does that to people. It's called phone rage.
She has a washer that she paid to have warrantied.
Proof from letter that I was able to understand from the very first reading with no additional questions asked of the writer:
"refund me the amount I spent on the worhtless warranty"
I am assuming extended warranty, and the washing machine must have been an older model, because of the concern and then surprise that it was still covered under warranty.
I am wondering if it's because the machine is an older machine that the parts are taking a little longer, although they had the first part in a week, and it was just a case of it being put in wrong by the service tech.
She didn't specify by title all the people she talked to, but she did supply the numbers. I am thinking she did that on the assumption that Sears would know which departments those were. We don't all work at Sears, so it wasn't helpful to us, but then again, she wasn't issuing her complaint to us. She was only sharing it as a warning to others. I can understand that she got upset when she was told she should have talked to the service manager, because she knew that she had done that.
She also mentioned that she got transferred by the company to a different extension, and that's probably why she ended up with all those phone numbers.
"I got back on the phone and called to get another repair man out. I was sent to a totally different location than the first time I called"
People have taken issue with her request for reimbursement of quarters and gas as a result of having to use a laundromat in place of her machine. Seems greedy and petty to some, but I can completely understand the reasoning. If the company had fixed it right the first time 5 weeks ago, she would have had the use of her machine.
People are saying that letters like this shouldn't be written in anger, and I do agree, but sometimes, no amount of taking a deep breath and stepping away from the keyboard will ease the frustration and anger when a person pays for an extended warranty; is told that the item is still covered under that warranty; waits a week for a service call and a part, only to have the tech put it in wrong; then waits another 5 weeks to have it fixed, playing phone tag and on the receiving end of the "pass the customer on" phone game; all while dragging her clothes out to a public place, paying more good money in order to have clean clothes, while a washing machine that she paid for, sits, unusable and unrepaired.
Then, as a service to others, she opts to share the letter and is taken to task by well-meaning people who critique and offer advice for her to do things that she has already done. She get frustrated and vents that frustration, and then is labelled as defensive and rude with a bad attitude.
Yep...guess I must be reading a PlanetFeedback letter. That's a familiar scenario. ;)
Reply
|
|

|
I agree
by S W Tue January 23, 2007 @ 8:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
I don't...
by Venice Tue January 23, 2007 @ 7:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Version 1.2 Posted Mon January 22, 2007 @ 10:33 PM
|
|
|
I can't answer this letter impartially because I've had three similar experiences in the past with the same company. I understand totally the feeling of being cut off and calling number after number without getting a reasonable time frame or even getting some understandable questions addressed. The whole voice mail thing is impersonal to begin with and then to get cut off once you DO get a real live person only adds more frustration.
I think what's bothering people reading it is the "quarters and gas" part, it does come across as petty. And then taking a defensive posture with commenters after deciding to share the letter in the first place. Basically, feedback comes in two flavors, what we want to hear and what we don't. It's our choice to pick what we feel is "constructive" and ignore the rest.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Lee H. Posted Mon January 22, 2007 @ 10:31 PM
|
|
|
I tried to agree with you on several points, but several issues stood out.
To begin with, why would the letter be signed "Pat Jeanette" but be posted by "brady d"? I also had a great deal of reserve for the requests at the end of the letter asking for reimbursement costs for laundry machine use and gas. Continuing to state that you're not being unreasonable "at this time" very much implies you are likely to become unreasonable, if not more unreasonable.
The consumer has a right to expect a level of service promised to him/her. We need to begin by asking is this warranty all inclusive or is it partial? Most warranties do not guarantee all parts or all labor. Many consumers make that mistake and then are surprisingly awakened to reality when they're given a bill for what is not covered.
Does the warranty guarantee service within a certain timeframe or guarantee a successful completion to the service within a certain number of tries? This guarantee is usually called a "No Lemon Clause". Whereas the consumer has not made mention of such, it can be assumed there is none.
Therefore, it can be determined that as long as the warranty provider is willing to make service calls, replacing any parts it determines is defective, at the cost guaranteed under the warranty, they have also complied with the warranty.
Whereas it was Sears that notified the consumer that the appliance was under warranty and then further complied with the warranty, they really should be commended.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Mon January 22, 2007 @ 9:25 PM
|
|
|
And that's about all I'm with you on.
You're asking for things even you acknowledge are unreasonable; you went out of your way to make this a shared letter and then insulted people for discussing it; you can't be bothered to get your own PFB account or proofread your own letter; and you're not being particularly nice with people who, whatever else you may think of us, have no responsibility for what happened with your washer and (again) are only even reading because you elected to show it to us.
You don't seem to be clear on whether this is an attempt to get your problem solved, a vent, a way of taking your frustrations out on at least one person who works for Sears, or what. If I were you, I"d figure that out, write the letter again with whatever goal you have foremost in your mind, and then either send it through the USPS or email or do it here but without clicking the box for sharing the letter.
A valid complaint can be buried under all the rest of it to the point that it gets lost, and while I think it's easy to see this letter as worse than it is because of the way in which you have chosen to participate in the discussion, the original letter could be a whole lot better. I hate to see someone with a valid complaint sabotage him- or herself, and while I wish you luck with this, I hope you will consider making it easier for Sears to resolve the problem the way it ought to be resolved.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by MommyG4 Posted Mon January 22, 2007 @ 9:10 PM
|
|
|
First, I would be ticked with waiting 5 weeks to have my washer repaired, depending on what was wrong and how long I had the washer. Hubby and I have been married 6 years and I think we have gone through 3 washers. Yep, you got it, 3. We have a family of 6 and the washer and dryer are going from 8 a.m. - 10 p.m. most every day. You do need information on how old your washer is and what type of warranty it is (regular or extended).
Hope you get your washer working. By the way, did either of the repairers say what was wrong? I always try to diagnois before calling repair people.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Okay, the only response I've read is the one at the top of the list (the most recent) -- I believe it was donno. I like donno. He's good people.
I think you're completely right, brady. This is ridiculous. I'm going to tell my MY washer under warranty story.
We got a new washer, then we moved. We forgot to bring the special pads that sat under the feet of the washer, to help keep the machine from moving while in the spin cycle. I called to get more sent to me. Because the washer was under warranty, I wasn't ALLOWED to put them in place myself (well, the husband would have done that, I would have supervi--I mean, watched).
I took a half day off of work, the guy came within the four-hour window (miracle!), I told him what we needed for the washer, and he didn't have the pads on him. He'd have to order them. He took my address so they'd be sent to me, and we could put them on ourselves we didn't need anyone to come out (he never even looked at my washer).
I was livid. I took half a day off of work for THAT? I sent a polite but firm letter to Montgomery Ward and itemized my missed time from work and what those hours cost me, and demanded payment of $100.
Guess what? I got a check for $100! The kicker was, they made it out to my HUSBAND and not to me! Grr I wanted to return that check so bad and demand another one, but even *I* know when to quit.
No big moral here, other than, sometimes, when you're in the right and they made a stupid mistake, you do get something from it. Occasionally, we have small victories in our battle with these behemoths that seem adept at taking our money for puchases but drop the ball completely when it comes time to service those items purchased.
I say, write a real letter. Letters STILL carry more weight than a phone call or an email (far more than an email). This is especially true in government (but who knows for how long).
So write a real letter. I'd clean up the grammar/English/spelling and make it a little less conversation-y and a little more formal, business-like.
Good luck!
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Mon January 22, 2007 @ 8:07 PM
|
|
|
I see that you are becoming inpatient with this situation. Unfortunately your inpatience is showing a bit too much, with the I. Diot stuff, etc below.
Frankly, it appears that one or more commenters has jumped down your throat. At first I thought it was premature, but after seeing the reply to the first respondent and rereading the original post I am inclined to change my mind.
The attitude in your original post could have been better. After all, you are trying to get some service or satisfaction in return for your complaint. I agree that 4-5 weeks to get to where you are at is excessive. Perhaps you could have questioned the value of the warranty instead of implying it is worthless. You had every right to mention the quarters and gas as part of your plight, but not to demand reimbursement for them.
I hope the washer is actually fixed this time. I feel your frustration. A large part of your post reflected this, and personally I find no problem with that. I have been through the multiple phone number, dropped call Bermuda Triangle and it stinks.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Mon January 22, 2007 @ 4:09 PM
|
|
|
I don't know where you got all those telephone numbers, but the only number I have ever had to call for service is 800-4 MY HOME, and although the computerized answering system is extremely annoying, once you get a person on the line, the rest is easy.
Even though I'm in the midst of an ongoing battle with Sears right now, I will say that I have never had any of the problems I read about here regarding service calls, but the repairmen always arrive in a Sears truck and work directly for Sears. I wonder if that's what makes the difference.
Did the repairman come to your house in a Sears truck, or was he an independent local guy? Just curious.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|

|
hee hee
by CandyPickletoes Tue January 23, 2007 @ 9:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by PaintedLady Posted Mon January 22, 2007 @ 2:44 PM
|
|
|
I don't see how the warranty was worthless, unless you had to pay out of your own pocket for service calls and parts. Your complaint should be with the service department, not the warranty itself.
Ask for the service manager, explain your situation, and maybe they will reimburse some of your expenses after the first repair(you would have paid those regardless; warranties don't often cover incidental expenses) since this is the fault of their repairman.
Reply
|
|

|
????
by brady dapp Mon January 22, 2007 @ 3:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|