|
|
Sears Eyewear Guarantee Not as Painless as I'd Hoped!
Posted Thu May 3, 2007 12:00 pm, by Eugene B. written to Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
A couple of weeks ago I bought a pair of eyeglasses and perscription shades from Sears Optical on Columbiana Drive. This went reasonably smooth, but when I had to return my eyeglasses for exchange because the frames were too heavy and I was getting headaches wearing them, things weren't so simple or smooth.
When I went to do the exchange, the woman there was not the same woman who had handled my initial order. She said she could not exchange the eyeglasses because she had NO authority to make a decision about the exchange. For the most part, she seemed to indicate that she was just there to keep the store open and did not know how to do anything re: exchnages, etc. I wondered if it was her first day. She said the manager would have to authorize the exchange before I could exchange, but I could look at frames and choose one if I wanted. I did. I had some questions about the frames, but she said she did not know the answers. I left the frames I selected with her, with the understanding that I could get my answers when I called the next day. She said she would leave a note on them for the manager who would be in the following morning.
It was my understanding that the manager would wait for my call and answer my questions before ordering my replacement glasses, but that's not what happened. Just a short time after the store opened (around 10:45) the following day, the manager called and left a message on my machine that she had in fact placed my order already. She stated they would call when my glasses were in so I could come in and pick them up.
This left my questions moot since the glasses were already ordered - and unanswered. If I had gotten the answers, I may have decided to come in and choose a different frame, but I was never given the opportunity or the answers.
I am not happy that my exchange was handled this way. I spent just under a $1000 with Sears for the initial glasses and Ray-Ban shades. It was a shock that Sears would hire someone who did not know anything about eyeglasses, about how to sell, etc. All she could do was leave a note and I am not sure she even stated in the note that I was supposed to call prior to the order being placed. She only said she would leave my name on the frames and indicate that I would be calling later in the day. However, I am not sure what she said in the note or why the manager went ahead with the order without consulting me first. I would have thought this would have been the first action when she found the glasses and note the next morning.
I will be getting my perscription back and placing my next order for eyeglasses elsewhere. I am unhappy with Sears given the way this exhange was handled - especially because their "guarantee" was my main reason for buying with Sears in the first place. Pricewise I could have done better elsewhere, but I chose what I felt was better service over price. I did not expect to be disappointed, but I felt Sears would have better staffing and people working in the optical sales area who actually knew something about what they are selling. That does not appear to be the case.
I got the exchange as per the guarantee but exchange for what? I may not have glasses on order that I will be happy with because my questions were never answered. This make me a bit disappointed in Sears. I have shopped with Sears all my life, but I will question whether I want to continue shopping in any business connected with Sears after this experience.
My eyesight is important to me, obviously, or I wouldn't be having eye exams purchasing glasses, so I wanted glasses that I felt comfortable with. That was my reason for making the exchange. As things stand, I hope the frames I selected will meet my needs since Sears apparently could not.
I planned to contact Sears through their website, but there wasn't an email for contact or even feedback.
Please hire people with experience or train your people in matters such as how to information on what they're selling, the exchange process, etc. And please have someone who can authorize an exchange or refund because it inconveniences customers when the customer has to make another trip to the store when the manager is in (I was told the manager had not been in that day). Phone calls obviously can lead to miscommunication and loss of crucial information (as is what happened in my instance.)The woman was reasonably friendly but it was alarming that she had no real knowledge of what she was selling, how to place an order, etc. I did not know Sears hired people who had no experience whatsoever. I needed my glasses asap because of the headaches, so not having someone their with knowledge or any authority caused a delay. I would have expected that Sears would have either had someone working who could do an exchange or someone in the Sears department store itself who could authorize an exhange.
I wasn't just inconvenienced: I may have yet another pair of glasses that did not work because my concerns were NEVER addressed. I expected more from Sears. Very disappointed.
The saleswoman was friendly but not very knowledgeable. She seemed unable make eyewear sales by providing information on products (frames or lens) and she stated she was without any authority to make any decisions.
Please hire people with experience or train your people in matters such as how to information on what they're selling, the exchange process, etc. And please have someone who can authorize an exchange or refund because it inconveniences customers when the customer has to make another trip to the store when the manager is in (I was told the manager had not been in that day). Phone calls obviously can lead to miscommunication and loss of crucial information (as is what happened in my instance.)The woman was reasonably friendly but it was alarming that she had no real knowledge of what she was selling, how to place an order, etc. I did not know Sears hired people who had no experience whatsoever. I needed my glasses asap because of the headaches, so not having someone their with knowledge or any authority caused a delay. I would have expected that Sears would have either had someone working who could do an exchange or someone in the Sears department store itself who could authorize an exhange.
I wasn't just inconvenienced: I may have yet another pair of glasses that did not work because my concerns were NEVER addressed. I expected more from Sears. Very disappointed. I need the glasses because of the headaches from my current glasses, so the saleswoman not being able to start the process for exchange was upsetting and frustrating. I had hoped it would be painless because of the guarantee. I can only assume that the saleswoman was acting 100% within her job requirements and authority and that Sears Optical does indeed operate in this manner. My receipt and guarantee did not state that this was how exhanges are handled, that there is a delay, that no one will be on site during business hours who can authorize even a simple exhange.
At this point, I just hope my glasses will meet my needs.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 100 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by Lena B. Posted Wed April 23, 2008 @ 1:45 AM
|
|
|
I know this is almost a year later, but nothing has changed. Inexperienced people, usually teenagers or college students, are hired part-time with training that consists of watching a set of instructional DVD's. The manager is overworked with little to no time off and has to cope with understaffing (usually the office is only staffed by one person at a time), poor quality frames and questionable lenses, very sloppy labwork (especially out of the Knoxville lab), and mountains of repititious paperwork.
Orders are lost or misplaced, communications are misdirected or lost, and Luxottica (Sears Optical's parent company) does not care as long as they get the initial sale (which makes their year look better and their stock prices rise). The employee turn-around is climbing to 70% within the first 3 months, according to the last regional manager's meeting. So, it's not unusual to visit a Sears Optical on a monthly basis and see new managers and/or new personnnel each time you visit.
There is no incentive to stay; the high pressure sales techniques a manager is required to do (similar to used car sales), along with the stress of making "goal" each week by whatever means necessary, along with the ridiculous paperwork that takes at least 1 to 2 hours a day to complete, along with the required daily marketing since Luxottica is too cheap to advertise Sears Optical (instead, relying on managers to try to waylay Sears retail customers and mall customers by announcing sales, handing out flier and coupons, getting customers to come in the store by promising free eyeglass cleanings, etc.), along with the stress of selling very inferior products at inflated prices, along with "owning the business" philosophy that each manager is supposed to believe, but can't since managers don't own the stores . . . I could go on and on.
Take my advice, since it's coming from an insider: don't get your glasses from Sears Optical.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by NUMNUTS Posted Tue February 19, 2008 @ 8:52 AM
|
|
|
sears is a joke. they are definitely going under as wall street has recently indicated. i always have to laugh that a dying company , shortly before they die, buys into another similar company (KMART) that is also dying, in order to gather strength in numbers and do the smoke and mirrors routine with the stock market and their shareholders in a last ditch attempt to salvage their name, their business,and their job. but, it isn't going to work. sears will be in chapter 11 shortly and considerting this man's experience and the 2 previous experiences i had with the company, it is no surprise. several years ago, i took my sears lawnmower to their service shop asking that they replace a cable. it's the cable that is connected to the handle that must be held with the regular handle in order to keep the mower running,(it's a safety feature). instead of them simply replacing this cable, some dimwit employee decided to take the engine apart and then declared that due to "scoring" of the cylinder wall, it wasn't worth fixing the mower, so he put the head back on the motor, estimated that it would cost $400.00 to fix it (replace the motor). naturally, i bounced off the ceiling a couple of times after hearing this, because the motor worked perfectly before i took it there. under cross-examination, they claimed the mechanic , "always tears the motors down on mowers , (i guess maybe this is a childhood fantasy he has about taking things apart), to see if it 'is worth the effort and money to fix the mower'". they refused to acknowledge that the mower worked fine before i brought it to them for the cable repair. the mechanic,(who they said was their ace mechanic), his supervisor, and the supervisor's supervisor all stuck together. the wouldn't fix it and claimed it didn't run. so, i sued them at the local magistrate level. they ignored the suit until the week of the hearing. i get a letter in the mail FROM CORPORATE stating that they will settle for $400 plus the cost of the magistrate if i cease and desist. of course, i accepted. after i got the check for the $460.00, i called the service center and asked if the mower was still there and if i could have it, they said sure, take it. i took it home, along with the 37 dollar cable , took it to my local shade tree mechanic. he installed the cable for 40 bucks and never touched the engine. that was 4 years ago, i am still using the mower today and i cut the lawn starting in late march til late october once a week.
last friday i bought a washer for my aged parents and scheduled a delivery and setup . they came on time on sunday morning at 7:30 a.m., removed the old washer and took it with them, cleaned the area , installed the new washer, and "claimed" that they leveled the washer. i got there later in the day and my mother then ran a load of wash. the washer was shaking bad during the spin cycle so, obviously, it wasn't level. as many of you know, they build washers today with self levelers, but that is only for the back feet. you pick up the washer (back), drop it back down and IT self levels. but, the front levelers are still manual. guess what, boys and girls, the nimrods never adjusted the front levelers, they weren't touched because the lock nuts were not tightened against the housing, so the evidence was right there that they didn't level the front. so, i had to get the level, put the washer on a 2x4, level the front OF the washer and now it's fine. i called sears yesterday, explained to them how incompetent their delivery guys were and they are sending me a $50.00 gift card for my trouble and anguish. they also promised to contact the supervisor of the crew that delivered the washer so that he could give them a remedial course on washer installation. IT'S ALL TRUE AND AS FORREST GUMP WOULD SAY, "THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT"..
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by EBoone Posted Sat May 5, 2007 @ 7:21 PM
|
|
|
My current glasses just fell aprt a few days after I got them, less than a week. I guess the saleswoman didn't tighten the screws when she adjusted them. The arm fell off while I was watching TV. The tiny screw was nowhere to be found, and I am now trying to wear these a little (to keep my eyes from straining too much) with a piece of floral wire holding them together. This has not been a pleasant experience. Most of the Sears responses have been super; only a couple of people were unhelpful or just plain rude. I tried to explain in a post that I am trying to write this without being able to see clearly because my orig eyesglass perscription was incorrect. Please accept my apologies for repeated sentences,typos, etc. Thanks for the helpful posts.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
re: Sears
by EBoone Sat May 5, 2007 @ 6:45 PM
|
|
|

|
Hmmm...
by JuliePie Sun May 6, 2007 @ 11:43 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Fri May 4, 2007 @ 11:37 PM
|
|
|
That was the longest letter I have ever read in my life.
Reply
|
|

|
re: Sears
by EBoone Sat May 5, 2007 @ 6:56 PM
|
|
|

|
No
by A A Sun May 6, 2007 @ 8:15 AM
|
|
|

|
re: No
by EBoone Sun May 6, 2007 @ 8:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Fri May 4, 2007 @ 5:58 PM
|
|
|
Shoooooooooot I payed 10 bucks for some nice sunglasses today... weren't Rx.. but i'm cheap so i'd pick the cheapest ones. I'm not all about "style" or anything.
Reply
|
|

|
re; Sears
by EBoone Sat May 5, 2007 @ 6:58 PM
|
|
|

|
re: Typo
by EBoone Sat May 5, 2007 @ 7:05 PM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Horsetuna Posted Fri May 4, 2007 @ 1:07 PM
|
|
|
I work at Sears. AT the bottom of our receipts it is printed: www.searsfeedback.com, which is the customer service/complaint line. There is also a 1-800 number but sadly I forget it. It does sound like the girl is new, however, the Sears Optical may have different return policies than Sears Retail does. I hope this helps.
Reply
|
|

|
Survey
by Marilyn Blocklinger Wed September 26, 2007 @ 12:58 PM
|
|
|

|
Survey
by Marilyn Blocklinger Wed September 26, 2007 @ 1:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
sears tran
by DONALD F GILLAM Mon October 8, 2007 @ 12:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
Complaint
by Cajun Queen Tue October 9, 2007 @ 7:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
shopping
by glenna Wed October 10, 2007 @ 5:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
vacuums
by robert gardner Thu October 11, 2007 @ 7:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
PURCHASE
by Doris Melemai Mon October 29, 2007 @ 12:22 AM
|
|
|

|
Feed back
by Bob Fritz Wed November 14, 2007 @ 5:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
024325310337
by steven l peters Thu November 29, 2007 @ 6:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Survey
by Adolfo Mendoza Sun October 14, 2007 @ 2:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
hello
by mirjan Fri December 28, 2007 @ 1:32 PM
|
|
|

|
027840204099
by Debra J. Ritter Mon October 15, 2007 @ 11:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
sears service
by William Shireman Sat October 20, 2007 @ 12:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
NEW GLASSES
by ROSEANN UMBERGER Sat October 20, 2007 @ 8:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
feed back
by Catherine Bruce Mon October 22, 2007 @ 8:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
service
by chana sanders Wed October 24, 2007 @ 1:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
sales cancel
by Anthony DeMartco Tue October 30, 2007 @ 9:44 AM
|
|
|
|
|

|
FEEDBACK
by crickett Sun November 4, 2007 @ 5:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
feed back
by Alfred McLaughlin Sat November 17, 2007 @ 12:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
feedback
by Lisa philbrook Sun November 25, 2007 @ 7:53 PM
|
|
|

|
shopping
by Barbara Eubanks Mon November 26, 2007 @ 5:45 PM
|
|
|

|
sales agent
by mesalyons Mon November 26, 2007 @ 7:13 PM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Nicole F Posted Thu May 3, 2007 @ 3:38 PM
|
|
|
Hello! I don't have much advice for you regarding Sears Optical since they are a licensee and the actual company is Cole Vision. And I don't work for Sears optical, just Sears.
However, I located their website but there is no e-mail for customer service on searsoptical.com. There is a phone number you can call 877-486-6486 and there is a mailing address listed under customer service at the very bottom of the page.
Though Sears Optical is a licensed business just using the name, the same guarantee is applied to them and all the licensed businesses in Sears (Hearing aid, portrait studio, watch/jewelery repair, etc.)
If you could of, you probably should have returned the next day so you could speak to the manager in person. Or you could have asked him or her all the questions on the phone and if the glasses weren't to your liking, I am sure he/she could have canceled the order.
Best of luck.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
re
by Nicole F Thu May 3, 2007 @ 9:16 PM
|
|
|

|
re: re
by EBoone Fri May 4, 2007 @ 9:29 AM
|
|
|

|
re: re
by EBoone Fri May 4, 2007 @ 11:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by EBoone Posted Thu May 3, 2007 @ 10:40 AM
|
|
|
I had a problem posting. Copy and pasting and some sentences are repeated. Please do not point this out when/if you post a reply. I am aware of it, and it was simply a problem with copy/paste. I used copy/paste after my initial text was lost during the posting process. Rather than go through the possibility of losing all my text again and having to re-do, I chose to copy/paste.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|