HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Please deny Brittany Holberg and Darlie Routier Their Appeals on Death Row!

Posted Thu November 10, 2005 10:39 am, by Mike H. written to State of Texas Attorney General

Write a Letter to this Company


I am suggesting that you deny death row inmates Brittany Holberg and Darlie Routier their appeals on death row. I am a resident of Ohio but I was appalled by the brutal murders those women in Texas commited. In 1996, Darlie Routier stabbed her two sons Damon and Devon to death in her home then slashed her own throat and staged the crime scene to make it look like a burglary. She laughed and sprayed Silly String all over her son's grave. That is proof that she hated her boys and wanted them dead. Thankfully, she was convicted and sentenced to death. Then there is Brittany Holberg, a young Texas woman who robbed an 80-year old man A.B. Towery in his home in Amarillo, Texas, and stabbed and beat the poor elderly man to death. She was convicted and sentenced to death. Both women are trying to asppeal their death sentences and I suggest you block their appeals. They deserve to die for the horrible murders they commited!


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 41 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.
by Mike H. Posted Tue November 8, 2011 @ 2:17 AM

I am sure glad I do not live in the Lonestar State. One of the evil
psycho women there may rob me and torture me to death and kill me.

Reply
by Ulysses Posted Tue February 22, 2011 @ 5:47 AM

One thing I don't get is why everyone is all mad that they are
lesbians. Basically, these women will be executed, murdered,
eventually. They have no TV, only radio maybe and a few books. They
can work pulling cotton apart, pretty boring, and talk. They are
often told they can't talk. They have nothing to look forward to.

The only joy they get is a little food, good literature and if they
can try to have sex with a male guard or enjoy being eaten out or
eating another woman out, what is wrong with that? Would you not try
to have sex if you were close to being executed? I find the resentment
to be very puritan and uptight. I respect them for trying to get some
joy out of life in a very difficult situation. As a bi woman I can
attest, at least while they are eating pussy or being
eaten out, their life is better than all the self-righteous uptight
people hating on them on line. They deserve that much pleasure. What
would possibly be the reason for them not to do so? I find your
pontificating bizarre! They should be celibate so we can kill them
after not enjoying any sex for 10-15+ years?. Weird.

Reply

I could not agree with you more by mark123a Mon March 19, 2012 @ 4:05 PM
by Kelldog Posted Sat November 13, 2010 @ 1:24 PM

3 years prior to the murder, Darlie was in Pennsylvania visiting
relatives. When she returned to Dallas, Darin told her that his car
was stolen. Being suspicious, Darlie confronted Darin. Darin fessed up
to her and admitted that he when to Barry Fife to have the vehicle
stolen. She got angry and Darin and Fife, did not approve of Fifes
influence on Darin, and confronted Fife about what he did. She
threatened to report him to the police. Fife (who used another party
to steal the car) told her, "You do not know who you are dealing with.
He would hurt your family and hurt your kids." Darlie eventually let
it go because of the threat and the concern of getting her husband
into big trouble. When the murders happened three years later, Darlie
and Darin both named Barry Fife and Ben Claybour (Denton TX) as
possible suspects. Claybour had once stolen Darin's credit cards and
charged up $10,000. The Routiers reported this to the FBI, but they
never charged Claybour despite the fact that he signed his own name on
the charge slips. It was not till years after Darlie's conviction that
Darin revealed that a short time before the murders, he had approached
Fife to burglarize his house. Fife has a history of this kind of
activity to defraud the insurance company. Fife's friend, Ben
Claybour, left the state when police wanted to question him. The
police did not do any further follow up on Fife or Claybour and
arrested Darlie for the murder. They probably arrested her in hopes
that she knew more and would rat out her husband rather than face
capital murder charges. However, this plan failed because Darlie knew
nothing and was not withholding any information from the DA.
Unfortunately, after the DA's plan failed, they were now committed to
following through her prosecution. They certainly could not release
her after making such a public arrest, even though behind the scenes,
it was intended to setup her husband. If Fife did arrange a burglary
and he used the same person that stole the car, then that person would
have a reason to kill Darlie since she would immediately suspect
Fife's involvement.

Chad Patterson, son of lead investigator Jimmy Ray Patterson, told
Jeff Crilley of Channel 4 news that he was at home the morning and
days following the murder when his dad was receiving numerous calls
and leads and would not follow up on many of them.

In the morning following the murder, the police received a 911 call
from a man named Reggie Salter who was reporting a suspicious man that
fit the description given by Darlie of the intruder. Lead investigator
Jimmy Ray Patterson chose not to check him out. See page 4151 of
Vol-42 of the Transcript. Had Patterson already decided to build a
case against Darlie? Was he concerned that he might find his criminal
son who was at large at that time? Patterson's son (Chad) was waiting
trial for a drive by shooting of a girl for which he was later
convicted. Why would investigator Patterson not check out a 911 call
that was made within hours of a murder when that call was about a
person who fit the description of a suspect of that murder? Read his
explanation in the trial transcript for yourself. This is shortly
before he takes the fifth amendment. After hearing what he has to say
I am sure you would feel very uncomfortable about his police work.



Darlie Routier is innocent and did not murder her 2 children, her
appeals should not be denied and she deserves a new trial and needs to
be exonerated of all murder charges. I got my proof of innocence from
the website http://www.fordarlieroutier.org/HerProof/CourtTV.html

Reply

Darlie Routier is Guilty by MrsC123 Sun August 28, 2011 @ 9:04 PM

by UCantBeSerious Posted Mon August 16, 2010 @ 12:01 PM

"Darlie Routier stabbed her two sons Damon and Devon to death in her
home then slashed her own throat and staged the crime scene to make it
look like a burglary. She laughed and sprayed Silly String all over
her son's grave. That is proof that she hated her boys and wanted them
dead. Thankfully, she was convicted and sentenced to death."

That is NOT proof she hated her sons nor is that alone proof she
murdered them. You evidently never seen the tapes of her at the grave
sobbing uncontrollably before and after the silly string. I for one
beleived Darlie was innocent after reviewing her injuries however, my
opinion has since changed some and Im on the fence about Darlie
however, none of what is stated above has anything to do with my fence
riding about her guilt.We know traditionally how we should and would
act if this happened to one of our children, but U just dont know. I
for one would be a mad woman, meaning, insane! I dont know how I would
act because I would have had a nervous breakdown. Anyways, what is
alarming to me is her type of injuries and how different they are from
her boys. Her boys were injured in a "stabbing" method where as I
never seen where Darlie was "stabbed" rather she was slashed
repeadedly. Hard to beleive a killer would then change up how they
would kill someone. Also, no type of DNA whatsoever belonging to a
foreign person, not even one hair! No hair? We humans lose hair
constantly, over 1,000 strands daily. How can thru all that ruckus and
violence the "intruders" hair never fall off his or her head? Not even
one? Not any blood? Sweat? Fingerprint? Nothing? A Ghost huh? Also,
Darlier said that she walked into the kitchen after she broke the
glass yet there are no photos of the bottom of her feet being cut and
she herself never claimed her feet were cut. How can U drop a wine
glass, and enter that area barefoot but not cut your feet? If this is
a cover up and a frame job, which I know for a fact it was horrible
police work and tunnel vision and the transcripts had over 33,000
errors and "re-do's" I would still think Darlie herself would state
the bottom of her feet were in fact cut as she walked into the kitchen
barefoot after she knocked over the wine glass. It was the Police's
shabby work and yes,they have manipulated and manufactured some
evidence and her injuries that originally had me thinking Darlie was
innocent but now, I just dont know. Darlie, im thinking you just may
have done this to your sons. But, why not the smallest boy? This is
quite a mystery. An enigma wrapped in a mystery. Sooooo many
questions. Sooooo many flaws. Hmmm. Well, I wont be singing anything
today one way or the other. For or against Darlie. Even if I had the
original transcripts, I would question it because of the 33,000
deliberate errors. If the case is so solid, why some of the evidence
manipulation? I dont know if I will ever make up my mind on this one
and typically, Im pretty solid. As for Brittany Holberg, I would need
to read more to know about her case but I do know that if I had ever
killed a man and then shoved a lamp pole 5 inches down his throat,
thats some serious rage and overkill and makes one wonder why would
someone become that enraged with this man? Do he do something? Not
suggesting that it makes it ok to do that, but I would need to
consider if this was cold blooded murder or if she snapped somehow
because of something he did to her?? Not very common for a woman to do
that much overkill just for the hell of it. I will not be signing
anything today. But based on Darlies case and the 33,000 ERRORS in her
transcripts and evidence files, she deserves a new trial.

Reply

Do some research by MrsC123 Mon August 29, 2011 @ 12:07 AM
by proud_mommy Posted Wed June 24, 2009 @ 8:11 PM

They both deserve the death penalty exspecaly darlie routier she is a
baby killer and everyone know it there just in denial if they think
other wise this woman should have been exacuted already what are they
waiting on!!! She's going to crack on day and spill everything she's
going to give herself up its just a matter of time and i don't feel
sorry for her on bit and neither should anyone else who is in there
right mind!!!! BURN IN HELL DARLIE!!!!

Reply
by MelissaSue Posted Sun February 1, 2009 @ 11:17 PM

Did you watch the same evidence as the other 9820 signed
petitioners...Not one juror saw those defensive wounds during the
trial..there are ways to give yourself wounds but not like the ones on
her..2 cm away from her main artery in her neck, not even a surgeon
could have got it that close without killing themselves...you are nuts
to think this girl did it...did you see the hour long tape of her
mourning her boys before the silly string...it was her sister who came
up with that idea to, no doubt cheer the mother up. No way I will deny
appeals, I hope they get appeals until the right governor or right
attorney gets someone to listen, so she can come home to the one kid
who is needing her love...and believe the other two decease sons,
would love to have mommy visit their graves....

Reply

Darlie Routier by MrsC123 Sun August 28, 2011 @ 9:38 PM

by Bobbob1234 Posted Mon August 11, 2008 @ 12:36 AM

Burn bitches burn.

Reply

darlie rouitier by Gillie Tue May 18, 2010 @ 11:59 PM

Incorrect information posted here by MrsC123 Sun August 28, 2011 @ 11:54 PM
by reachrlr Posted Thu August 7, 2008 @ 11:44 PM

There is reasonable doubt in this case. Guilty or not Darlee deserves
a fair trail. Dancing on her sons grave may have been in bad taste
but it does not make her guilty. The facts will set her free if she
is given a chance at a real defense. Tell me, whose bloody thumb
print was it on the coffee table? None of the Routiers, so who else
was there? Also the states forensic scientist lost his license and is
in rehab! Can he be trusted? At the very least she deserves to
defend herself fairly before the state of Texas murders her, which by
the way will NOT bring those boys back.

Reply

The Forensic Scientist by Wimothy W. Thu July 15, 2010 @ 6:07 AM

Darlie Routier, child murderer by MrsC123 Mon August 29, 2011 @ 12:05 AM
by mystorm Posted Wed June 11, 2008 @ 12:28 AM

This letter is about a death row inmate pam perillo who was exonrated
from death row and had her sentence commuited to life in prison plus
30 years! She was on death row for 19 years and spent a few with
Brittany and Darlie. I was on bench warrent with Pam Perillo went she
went back to harris county jail for her new trial. I use to read all
her letters from these girls. All Darlie writes about is the sex
letters and she has many she writes on the male units. Then I read
how devestated she is about her babies, but then I read in her own
writing about sex, men, sex...these girls are all a sham trying to get
out of a really bad situation, and then Brittney who was pam Perillo's
lover in the death row. Her letter were all the same, how she missed
her lover pam. Pam got off death row, and the things I experienced
with her in the jail cell at the harris county jail is like a real
movie. I was in protective custody and that is why I was with Pam and
protective custody is where death row inmates reside on bench warrent.
Pam did drugs in the jail, had sex, with guards as well as inmates,
and then she uses the minstries for money to support herself while in
the jail for commissary, and then the minstries come TO VISIT THEM
,and the personality changes from dyke to christian girl, all in the
name of commissary and these minstries fall for it, and she would
laugh all the way to commissary. I was there for a property crime, I
did my time and because of people like pam perillo and Darlie and
Brittney, I learned I was not like them and didnt want to be like
them, I just wish the public could lift away the sympathy they show
these girls who are all murders, and liers and stop supporting them,
you should check out the bank balances on those death row inmates,
they are loaded, they make a business out of their celeberty status,
they do, and they clean up from the minstries and the public who get
mezmorised by these girls! Stop it, they are killers and minuplators
and all of you are bying into it, and they are living a good life in
prison with all the money the sympathy gets them. please wise up!
Brittney stuck a light pole from one of those lamps that touch the
celing and to the floor, she stuck that pole down that mans throat,
and darliee, she stabbed those babies as they laid at her side and
never even gave it a thought as they gurgled their last breath or
cried out for mommy, what are you doing to us, why are you killing me!
STOP HELPING SUPPORT THESE GIRLS, STOP WRITING TO THEM...LET THEM ROT
LIKE DYING CHILDREN IN THEIR GRAVES,,,,,,,,

Reply

In responce about Pam by Tiffany D. Fri September 26, 2008 @ 9:35 PM

by gregy03 Posted Sat May 31, 2008 @ 7:31 AM

I agree with you. Fry both of these miserable sluts. First though
they should be boned up the ass till they squeal so they have an idea
of what inflicting pain on victims is like.

Greg

Reply
by Ashley A. Posted Sat March 1, 2008 @ 11:47 PM

There was evidence of a break in at the Routier home and how would
having her children dead and gone help her finacially? I highly
suggest you do a little more research- it has been proven since then
the trial was ambushed by prosecutors (i.e. they coached witnesses on
what to say, contrary in many cases to written statements that had
been written before the trial and were not released to her defense
team until after the trial), that important evidence pointing to her
innocence was withheld from the defense, etc etc etc...many people,
including the media, who originally came to the same conclusion as
you, followed up with their own research after the trail and their
opinions about Darlie changed very quickly...they have all bravely
written countless editorials apologizing for their quick, thoughtless
accusations and now support her appeal. See writers sites such as
Barbara Davis...then maybe you'll see the whole truth...

Reply

DARLEE by asdfsd Sun May 4, 2008 @ 10:40 PM

Darlie Routier case by Waycross48 Wed October 14, 2009 @ 11:17 PM
by krissy1998 Posted Wed February 20, 2008 @ 3:19 AM

apparently you did not see the whole video, and you have never lost a
child. get the facts before you shoot your mout off. What about the
bloody fingerprint that did not match anyoe in the house? What about
te fact that her husband was trying to hav the house robbed for the
insurance and was hidding it from her? What about the bloody sock? you
have no idea what you are talking about!!!

Reply

She's guilty by Mike H. Wed November 19, 2008 @ 7:49 PM

Darin's prints on the knife by MrsC123 Sun August 28, 2011 @ 8:59 PM

by copland Posted Sun November 4, 2007 @ 4:54 PM

This makes me sick to my stomach!!!!,,,I happen to be a police officer
and have been for 23 years. Can't you see that there is no way Darlee
could have bruised the under side of her own arms and cut her own
throat? Have you reviewed all of the evidence in this case? Do you
know what actually happened here, or are you going by what you saw on
TV? I love when people just assume that because the police say it, it
must be true.

Let me educate you regarding the mindset of the police department.
Just because there is enough evidence to charge her, doesn't mean she
is guilty. For future reference, the police dont care if you are
innocent in this kind of high pressure case. They care about putting
the community at ease and closing the case. The person going to jail,
is the person who they have enough evidence to convict. Guilt or
innocence plays a very small part in a case like this. If they knew
who actually killed those boys but didnt have evidence to charge them,
Darlee would still be the one going to jail- Understand now? The
police are under pressure to catch a murderer. People in the
neighborhood are afraid to go to sleep at night. The police have to
convict someone and make sense of this in order to get the higher ups
at the department and the city off their backs; and they will do this
by ANY MEANS NECCESARY! If they can't find the murderer or if they
don't have enough evidence to convict the real killer, then they will
convict any person that they can gather enough evidence to convict.
Usually, the husband, wife, son, brother ect. They can always come up
with a bllshit motive when its a family member or close friend. They
can always come up with forensic evidence such as blood, saliva etc.
How many times has your spouce had a cut or nose bleed or mabey their
gums bleed when they brush their teeth. Believe me they can find DNA
in any bathroom in the USA. If you are killed by a stranger, it's
hard to come up with a motive that a jury will believe. It's also hard
to find DNA linking strangers. So the fact that Darlee was charged
just means that they either had no other suspect or they didn't have
enough evidence to charge the real killer. Once they came up with a
reasonable scenario for the killing of the Ruthier boys (by their
mother)they didnt need to look for the real killer.

The police illege that Darlee stabbed her own kids to death,,,woke her
husband,,,ran up the alley and planted a sock while he wasnt looking,
cut her own throat, inflicted bruises all over herself,,,and then
called 911.

The motive? She was afraid of losing her lifestyle?

According to court documents Darlee had asked Daren, for a separation
that night. she didn't need to kill her kids, she had told him that
she was leaving. Think!!!! None of it makes sense. But stupid people
just take whatever law enforcement says as gospel. And they will
continue to convict innocent people as long as the public allows them
to do so.

I wonder if it were people like you who crucified Christ?

Reply

Darlee R by asdfsd Sun May 4, 2008 @ 10:48 PM

AMEN Darlee Might Just MIGHT be innocent by reachrlr Thu August 7, 2008 @ 11:48 PM

Darlee Innocent? by Waycross48 Sun December 28, 2008 @ 10:36 PM

A little of this, a little of that by HoldenCaulfield Mon June 8, 2009 @ 9:55 AM

PLEASE... by little elmo Fri June 19, 2009 @ 5:36 PM
by Mike Holly Posted Mon July 2, 2007 @ 10:28 AM

I am convinced by the forensic evidence alone that Mrs. Routier killed
her kids. I watched the case on tv and the crime scene investigators
and police found no evidence of a break in at the Routier home. The
jury believed that and the evidence convinced them. Mrs. Routier had
financial reasons for wanting her kids dead. She is as evil as any
mother can be. As for Miss Holberg, that white trash b*tch was a
prostitute who abused drugs and in my opinion, murdered Mr. Towery
because he refused to give her money for drugs. I learned that A. B.
Towery was actually a gentle old man and the accusations he beat his
wife and kids are false. I beleive he hid not attack Miss holberg when
she killed him and that he was killed for his money to buy drugs. I
cannot wait until Texas executes those two evil women.

Reply

mike about brittany holberg by pink charity Mon February 4, 2008 @ 8:59 PM

You're wrong! by Mike H. Wed November 19, 2008 @ 7:51 PM

I hate Texas! by Mike H. Sat November 29, 2008 @ 11:59 PM

You might do a little more research before you talk... by Ashley A. Sat March 1, 2008 @ 11:45 PM

You're wrong! by Mike H. Tue November 8, 2011 @ 2:15 AM
by kingme Posted Mon June 4, 2007 @ 5:35 PM

First of all, shooting silly string does not suggest guilt in the
least. My father was a drinking man, so we have poured beer on his
grave to honor him with something he would like. Other people shot
the silly string too; according to your verification of "proof of
guilt", shouldn't they be on death row too? If she is proving her
guilt by shooting silly string, isn't every one else there admitting
there guilt too? You really should be careful passing judgement &
wishing people dead because we all will have to answer to a higher
power someday. And yes, older men can be abusive, sick animals too.
Just because it isn't commom that they are, doesn't that they don't
exist!!! When you are dealing with a drug addict, you are dealing
with a chemical, not a person as a whole. I hope & pray that you &
your family are never in a situation where any of you become addicted
to drugs. Or would that be different because it's YOUR family? And
by the way, no sins are ranked in order of severity. A sin is a sin
no matter what & we are all sinners. Morally, crimes are worse than
each other but sins....sorry, no difference. If God can forgive, then
who are??? Are you God's boss? No, just another cold soul. Open your
eyes to the politics of all of this legal killing & the people being
exploited by the media.

Reply

by ange Posted Sat May 5, 2007 @ 7:28 AM

Those are some very interesting facts! I am guessing that this person
has no legal experiance right? You are stating that "they commited a
murder/s". Were you there? If so, I am sure that the police would love
to hear from you!
These are the facts!

Reply

The Guilt of Brittany Holberg by Waycross48 Wed October 14, 2009 @ 11:40 PM

Hatred of Lesbians? by Mariah P. Sat July 24, 2010 @ 5:12 AM




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2012 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada