 |
|
|
by Deirdre D. Posted Thu February 19, 2009 @ 3:27 PM
|
|
|
When restaurants are required to post nutrional information on a product they need to have standards to meet the nutrional information posted. Most have required of X ounces of meat etc. Now you can certainly request revisions on your food and ask for extra onion or extra cheese etc.
When you see photography of food in the menu it is never the actual product. For example when you see a commerical with a turkey the turkey is frozen...painted with shoe polish and the one area they may carve cut is cooked in a spot location with a torch. They do this so the turkey keeps that plump look while under hot lots during a photo shoot etc.
I do think the "sandwich artist" at subway may need some lessons as it is about customer service. My motto is give me customer service, value and quality.
I say good for you for letting subway know. Often in my profession I send people out to pick up my lunch and they don't know to say Ahhh that doesn't look like enough meat etc. they just place the large orders and dash out. Subway needs to be made aware so they take some extra time and attention with their product quality.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Wolf Posted Sat February 14, 2009 @ 7:10 PM
|
|
|
I was at a conference this week. There were two guys one day that went to Subway. They got the SAME bread, SAME meat and their sandwiches looked COMPLETELY different. Why? One was loaded with veggies, the other had none.
Looking at the pictures, one is loaded one is not. If you wanted your to look like the other one, ask for more. When they ask me for what I want, I say "lettuce, a bit more please, cucumber, loads of green pepper, carrots and Parmesan cheese" that is in addition to the mayo and honey mustard.
So you see, it is all in WHAT and how MUCH you ASK for.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Echo_Hawk Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 2:22 PM
|
|
|
We all know now that, "what you see is NOT what you get". Most (I really would love to say all) advertisement agencies use the same tricks.
In the case of food items, they are actually not even real. Yup, just like the plastic fruit Aunt Joan used have out, same deal. Crafters make these products from Styrofoam and airbrush them.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by shane h. Posted Mon February 9, 2009 @ 11:05 PM
|
|
|
we don't expect much when we go to corporate food restaurants, but i have been suprised and disappointed eating at them. if you get some lazy employee making your food your food looks like that. be even if taco bell's made correctly it looks close to the photo and tastes ok. i could name 10 subways in los.angeles that serve slop. i've eaten at numerous restaurants near the studios w/ substandard food . if these execs can't regulate the stores or restaurants that could make them famous or infamous, then philadelphia's s.o.l.!
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Nate. Posted Mon February 9, 2009 @ 6:50 PM
|
|
|
Since when does the food look like the picture? Never.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by PepperElf Posted Sun February 8, 2009 @ 12:44 PM
|
|
|
Yes I'm giggling.
I learned this back when I was a child. The photo will never look like what you get.
In grade school they taught us that the food in the photo is usually plastic or rubber, and they use a lot of photo tweaking (camera angle, special lighting, air brushing) to make it look as good as possible.
In fact, you can actually buy special lighting boxes just to showcase small items - like food, ebay items, etc - in order to sell them.
And as for asking for more meat... you can get more meat, but you pay for it.
Besides as everyone else has said.. YOUR sandwich has almost no vegetables. Yet you expect it to look *identical* to a sandwich that's filled with them!
You know... Come to think of it MY sandwiches look more like the "picture perfect" one... because I ask for all the veggies.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Final Score: Boys-3, Girls-1 Posted Sat February 7, 2009 @ 9:25 PM
|
|
|
Food is like models and actresses. They primp and airbrush and do whatever it takes to make the food look good for the photo shoot. Trust me, you DO NOT want to eat the sandwich in the picture. It's not even edible. They spray it with stuff, they use plastic parts, it gets poked and over-handled. Then, afterwards, they Photoshop the hell out of it.
Also, what did you order for veggies? If you take a good look at the "model" sandwich, you'll notice it has "the works" for veggies and not really that much meat. It makes it look bigger than yours, but the meat content is really the same.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Beeracuda Posted Sat February 7, 2009 @ 9:14 PM
|
|
|
You do realize that it probably took a long time for Subway to put together that sandwich that they're advertising, right? It's not just Subway either. It's any food joint that displays photos of their products.
Of course they want their sub to look as packed as possible. However, the picture you are seeing in the ads are misleading. You are looking at it from the front, which means all meats and veggies are pushed to the front to give the impression they are overstuffed. If you were to look at that same sub from the side, as the one you bought, there would be a lot of empty space inside near the fold of the bread.
I'm not saying it's right - it IS misleading. However, chances are that the amount of meats and veggies are nearly identical between the two photos (net weight). Now, this may differ from one store to the other, so it's quite possible that they did rip you off.
However, when is the last time you saw, in real life, a Big Mac or Whopper sitting 5" tall, as advertised?
Frankly, if they advertised the sandwich as it's sold to the consumer, it would hardly make anyone rush out to buy one. Not saying it's right - I'm just sayin'...
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Subway's sandwiches taste good though, but GRANTED they could make theirs look like the ones advertised. That's why I mostly go to Quizno's or Penn Station.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Queenie22 Posted Fri February 6, 2009 @ 6:48 PM
|
|
|
pictures of advertised food items rarely look like the actual ordered item. it's too bad that they do it but hey, that's life. they probably do it to show all the items that are on something so they don't get sued for that by someone else claiming they couldn't tell from the picture what was on the sandwich. If you felt like the sandwich didn't have enough meat or veggies on it you should have spoke up. if you really weren't that satisfied why didn't you just walk out? did someone have a gun to your head and make you pay for it? did another person hold a gun to your head when you took that gigantic bite too? not trying to be mean but let's use some common sense. frankly the sandwich on the left would be waaaaay too big to eat without smashing it down anyway!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
What
by Wolf Fri February 6, 2009 @ 7:20 PM
|
|
|

|
Re: What
by trustno1 Sun February 8, 2009 @ 7:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Underdog Posted Fri February 6, 2009 @ 1:22 PM
|
|
|
While I agree there may be an extra fold of meat on the ad shot,this is the natural affect wrapping anything has on the item.
They should have an exact weight of the "money items" they put on there.
I opened a place in Myrtle Beach years ago and consulted with a firm that tells you how much of each item to dispense and they would break down cost and profit,it's called "portion control"
This is why places like McD's use boxes for their signature items,cost a bit more and worse for the planet but makes for a much nicer presentation.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Blackrack Posted Thu February 5, 2009 @ 11:39 AM
|
|
|
Wow, maybe Canadian Subways are just better, because every time I eat there they look a lot more like the one on the left and taste great.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Cunningham Posted Thu February 5, 2009 @ 11:01 AM
|
|
|
it's very apparent that the pic on the left has an abundance of veggies that the pic on the right does not.
As far as the meat is concerned, it looks to be about the same, so if you CHOSE not to get all the same veggies (or as much) as the pic on the right, how is that THEIR fault?
And every Subway up here has pre-prepped meats so every sandwich gets EXACTLY the same amount of meat, the bulk comes from what you add to it, which, you can put as much veggies or dressings as you like OR pay for additional meat for like $1.00.
Unless you plan on ordering the sandwiches EXACTLY as they are advertised, it seems kind of unfair to accuse them of shortchanging you when they build the sandwich to you specifications.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I've only been to Subway once in recent memory and it was terrible. There was so little meat on it I felt like I was eating a bread sandwich. This is why I go to my local deli where I can get a packed sandwich on a roll for about $5.00.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by smt Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 7:38 PM
|
|
|
OK, why don't we send in our answers to 5 questions regarding Subway:
1. Do you feel the sandwiches Subway advertises on TV look like the the sandwiches you actually get at Subway?
2. Do you think you are getting your money's worth at Subway?
3. Is the quality the same in all Subway shops?
4. Do you feel satisfied after eating a Subway?
5. Would you recommend Subway to your family and friends?
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
To me it looks like someone took a bite out of the sandwich then took the picture. The bite area is squashed where your hands would go to hold the sandwich and bite.
I love their 5 dollar subs. I get the meatball one and eat one 6 inch for dinner and take it to work the next day for lunch.
If I am not mistaken they make it in front of you. If it is not to your liking, the time to tell them is then. The one in the picture looks fully loaded
It may also have double meat and cheese which costs extra. My wife gets the club with all the vegetables and looks very similar to the one on the right.
Good Day
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 4:00 PM
|
|
|
I'm looking at these two sandwiches, and honestly this looks like a comparison of the advertised and actual products a lot of chain fast food joints.
The actual product is mashed down, and it is very possible it contains the spec amount of ingredients.
I'm not saying it looks appetizing - it doesn't. It reminds me of the scene in Falling Down, where Michael Douglas challenges the manager as to the pictured product vs what he was served.
Not pertinent to the current discussion: I think that when the manager says he can't serve breakfast 1 minute after the end of breakfast, Douglas says "The customer is always right," and the manager replies "We don't subscribe to that policy."
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Ronnie D Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 1:59 PM
|
|
|
I haven't patronized Subway for several years now, and not only for their "bread only and skimpy ingredients sandwiches", but also for the lack of customer service.
Here's my point - I went into the Subway in Suwanee, GA to purchase a meatball sub for my daughter. All my daughter wanted on the sandwich was the meatballs and some black olives. When the employee made the sandwich, she put two (2) super small sized meatballs (yep, only 2), and then she counted out eight (8) small slices/pieces of black olives. When I asked for an additional meatball and some more olives, she yelled back at me "NO" this is how much goes on the sandwich. I even offered to pay additional money for what I wanted on the sandwich and again she repeated "NO" very sarcastically. I then informed the Subway employee that Subway was already making a profit on my daughter's sandwich because she didn't want lettuce, tomatoes, onions, peppers, or anything else on the sandwich other than the meatballs and olives. Needless to say I still didn't get anywhere in the discussion to prove my point with the Subway employee, so I just decided to leave the Subway shop.
From that day, and up to this writing I make sure that I tell everyone that talks about patronizing a Subway what happened to me that day, and I will keep asking friends, family and acquaintances not to buy anything from Subway.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Richard S. Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 1:35 PM
|
|
|
One thing I would like to add. Does your stomach actually care what the sandwich looked like before it was digested?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Ronnie D Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 1:29 PM
|
|
|
jkj
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Other than those two sandwiches not looking anything alike... you can guess how the first sandwich was made: There is nothing BEHIND those ingredients you see -- they're all laid out in front, stacked on one another, to make the sandwich look as full as possible. But I bet the pre-measured amounts are in there, re their legal department.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
It's true that they all do it the same. However, "the same" is apparently not consistent with the ads.
What you need to do is bring in the picture and ask for it as shown in the picture. Meat folding and fluffing, if that's it, and all.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
All this Subway is making me hungry. I like Subway, but love Mr. Sub (canadian). Now I think my daughter and I will have to stop there on our way home from Mommy and me.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Richard S. Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 11:36 AM
|
|
|
If you look at any fast food restaurant you will notice the actual sandwich you receive never looks like the sandwich from their stock photo or on a commercial.
All Subway sandwiches are made in front of you, the way you ask for them. While your sandwich was being made, did you ask for more vegetables to be added if you thought they did not put enough on it? That was the time to speak up.
Also if you are going to be taking pictures of sandwiches to make a comparison, the sandwich should be the same type and the picture should be taken the same way - the Subway photo shows the length of the sandwich while your picture shows the width.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by snarly Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 11:15 AM
|
|
|
This really isn't a comment on your complaint towards Subway--which is pretty clear thanks to your pics. But you're in Philly...Land of the Hoagie! I grew up outside of Philadelphia and now have moved to the West and I can't tell you how much I miss hoagies (and pretzels and schnitz and good sweet corn). Will you kiss Subway goodbye and have a hoagie for me, Sidney? Thanks, you're a peach.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Nate. Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 10:30 AM
|
|
|
Speak with your wallet and switch brands. I did so a long time ago. Subways prices are too high for the amount of meat you receive. Quiznos is delicious, and their $5 subs have 3x as much meat as Subway. You also may want to try Lenny's.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by MayDay Posted Wed February 4, 2009 @ 10:18 AM
|
|
|
This is why I quit going to subway, they make bread sandwiches constantly. I may do a comparison like this next time I go to Arbys...their commercials have this roast beef stacked up way high then you get an actual one and it's flat as a pancake.
My favorite place for subs would have to be Wegmans, their subs actually do look like the one shown here on the left and you can get a 14 in. sub for 6.99! Can't beat it and it is always made fresh to order.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
That's a HUGE difference. Looks like you got the heel of a loaf of plain bread, not some seasoned roll like shown in the picture.
Great letter.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
If you could take apart the sandwich on the left, it may have most of the same ingredients as the one on the right, but its called presentation. And while we would all like our food to look as perfect as it does in the ads it will not...unless of course we prepare it ourselves.
That said in all the years I have gone to Subway to get my tuna sub mine has NEVER looked as horrible as the one on the right...but it has never looked perfect like the one on the left either.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
WOW! That's quite a difference! Like some people say, a picture is worth a thousand words.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|