 |
|
|
by reneeshea Posted Mon September 21, 2009 @ 10:03 PM
|
|
|
Who should be refunding you, would be the thief who stole your phone. T-Mobile would be bankrupt if they allowed everyone to call and state "Oh I didn't know my phone was stolen". You should be getting the money from the child's parents who stole your phone.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Y Silver Posted Wed February 7, 2007 @ 8:13 PM
|
|
|
Perhaps this response is inappropriate since it is not directly related to the initial reason the message was written. However, in response to the other persons' responses, I am surprised that so many people are questioning the teacher for not having the phone locked in a secure place. I am not remarking on whether or not she is a good teacher, or what she wrote was appropriate or not. I am writing about my amazement in so many people blaming the victim. Her phone was taken by a student. That is NOT OKAY. Perhaps teachers should lock up their personal belongings, etc.- however, the issue here is still that the student took something that was not theirs and then even proceeded to use it maliciously. Students should respect teachers. This is just one way to exemplify blatant disrespect. Even if the teacher had an envelope marked "$200 cash" on her desk, she would still be the victim if it was stolen. I am not ignorant to the fact that leaving things out on your desk (at school or elsewhere) perhaps is not a good idea. But nevertheless, even if you do, no one has the right to take it. Especially not a student because school is a place where certain respectful behaviors are expected (as should be expected in all of life).
I am a high school teacher who recently had my cell phone taken off my desk one day during extra help after school. The student called his phone in order to get my number. The next two weeks were filled with me receiving prank phone calls and messages, on both my cell and home phone. Eventually, we were able to find out who took the phone.
Of course I was questioned as to why I had the cell phone out on my desk to begin with. Perhaps it was stupid.
But again, nevertheless------- I am an adult and professional. We ARE allowed to have cell phones at school even though the students are not allowed to use them during the school day. The teachers DO strive to set a positive model for students--- we don't walk around using our cell phones all the time. I don't even think I have seen or come across one of my colleagues on their phone this year except once or twice in the faculty room. Perhaps every once in a while a teacher may need to use their cell phone. We are adults. The students need to realize that the rules are different for adults (for a reason). In my case- my mother has been sick and I had been speaking with the head of gastro-intestinal surgery from the hospital we were trying to transfer her to. I might add that I was on the phone during my FREE period. I don't even remember, but I probably just threw the phone on my desk when I got off the phone when my next class was starting.
Be careful of victim blaming. Watch your words- what you say and don't say. We are responsible of setting examples for others. -teacher from new york
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
yeah
by Courtney C Fri February 9, 2007 @ 1:44 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Stacey:
How long have you been teaching? I am appaulded that first off you have a cell phone in your presence and we are teaching our children they can have in their possession of cell phone. You are a role model in case you have forgotten. Hypocrite, yes that is a word now. I used to teach preschoolers, kindergardeners, and college students. We are to be examplar to all. We are to stand out as an educator. We are the lasting impression of the children. You implying a statement of a children publicly on the internet, why I am ashamed of you! What if this child reads this. What hope does he have of trying to even change. Teachers are to give them this hope even if they do not receive it at home. Poor example. Maybe we need to address this issue with your institution were you teach. I hope your peers are not agreeing with you. I'll tell you like I tell my patients and my students, you personal belongings are your responsibility and you can blame someone or nothing else on what happens to your property. We are a sounding board, but we can not condone wrongdoing. You need to be disciplined! You need to stay in retention in my book for the rest of the school year. Questionable staff behavior! You are problaby a very strict teacher that can never do no wrong though, right? T-mobile has done nothing wrong. Infact, I think they gave you more than you deserve.
Your Personal belongings belong in your locker. You should not have it in the class room to begin with. Unless your texting and talking on the cell phone without permission. Now that problaby the turth, right?
Some people just need to grow up! This Instructor/Doctor does not feel sorry for you!
A. Ph.D.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Ph.D.
by tickytack Mon February 5, 2007 @ 10:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Thu February 1, 2007 @ 2:36 PM
|
|
|
It's good to know that if my car ever gets stolen, I can go to the dealership and have them pay for any damages to it and any gas used. After all, it's not my fault if someone steals my car it must be the dealer's fault. I bet they'd replace it free of charge to avoid bad press.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I think the biggest question is...
Why did a teacher have a cell phone on them when most schools have outlawed students having them?
The hypocricy is amazing.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
*worms..
by eloh Thu February 1, 2007 @ 11:08 AM
|
|
|

|
Hey stupid
by Juicy Jade Sat February 3, 2007 @ 9:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Sun January 28, 2007 @ 8:57 PM
|
|
|
"I would think T-Mobile would want to keep a valued customer happy as everyone can have something like this happen to them and should not be penalized once."
I don't know what that statement means, but you should not be referring to your student as a future inmate on the internet. You are a professional. Yes, I might say something like that privately off school premises.
I do not think necessily think it is appropriate for T-Mobile to credit your account. I don't know when you contacted them, but you make it sound as though it was after the illegal access to your phone. As others have pointed out, and you should realize, it would be a learning experience for the student if his or her parents reimbursed you.
If the parents don't step up to the plate, I think you are out of luck. It is a learning experience for you, however. I assume you will keep your phone out of reach of the students in the future.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by JuliePie Posted Sat January 27, 2007 @ 7:43 PM
|
|
|
Unless you purchased some sort of theft insurance on the phone that says in writing that T-Mobile will reimburse you if your phone is lost or stolen, you're up the creek. It doesn't matter how your phone got stolen, T-Mobile is under no obligation to reimburse you for any charges that occured before you reported the phone stolen.
I would suggest what others have said, that you take this up with the student's parents and the police. If you can prove this particular student stole the phone, you should be able to settle this in small claims court.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Sat January 27, 2007 @ 6:44 PM
|
|
|
A "good customer" has 20 lines and buys many accessories each month.
A plain old "customer" has one line and is required to pay their bill on time in exchange for service.
It is also your responsibility to keep your phone from getting stolen. If you had just gone to the bank and taken out $200 and the kid took it from your purse, would the bank give you $200?
Why should T-Mobile be expected to credit things that they have no control over what-so-ever?
If I was T-Mobile and knew you expected I would pay for any charges from a stolen phone, I would only do so if you let me lock it up in a safe all day and night so I would know it wouldn't be stolen and I would have CONTROL over whether it got stolen.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Pass code
by A A Mon February 5, 2007 @ 9:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Mr. Mafia Posted Sat January 27, 2007 @ 3:54 PM
|
|
|
Well, if you know who this student is, he/she should pay the bill.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Ok, as a parent, I feel I must weigh in.
First of all, it does not matter how this student got the phone. The point is, the phone is not his and as a 5th grader (10 or 11, I'm guessing) he should know that if it is not his, he is not allowed to play with in unless he has permissin. Period. The fact that he had possession of the phone and was downloading stuff to it without Stacy's permission means one thing: He stole it. I don't care if it was sitting out on the desk. He had no right to pick it up. End of story.
The comment about him being a "future inmate" was probably made out of frustration. I'm not excusing it, but I can understand why she said it. I do think that it should have probably been made over coffee with a friend, and not in a business letter. It is not appropriate here.
If it was my child who stole someone's phone, then I would feel responsible for any and all charges that he accrued on the phone. The child, a minor, committed a crime, and his parents are respnosible for making restitution to the victim of the crime.
I remember when I was 12 or so playing catch with my brother and breaking the neighbor's garage door. Guess who was weeding the yard and mowing lawns to pay for the replacement panel?
I sincerely hope that this student's parents will do him a favor and show him that his inappropriate behavior has consequences. It very well may save him from fulfilling Stacy's prediction.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Lee H. Posted Sat January 27, 2007 @ 9:13 AM
|
|
|
Stacey,
I can only echo some of the same remarks already made by others.
I would highly question you calling one of your students a "future inmate" on a public forum. It has absolutely no credit towards you or your profession. Now, I can agree it may be true, but stating it in the way you have really does belittle you as the letter writer, including your request for additional credit.
I would also suggest considering how the student got a hold of your phone. Did he just see it sitting out somewhere, left unattended, and therefore pick it up, thinking he had just found a cool new toy. If so, I would suggest you hold the responsibility of what took place with the phone within the time he had it.
If he broke into your personal possessions like a desk or closet, then you should have the right to meet with the boys parents and have them pay the bill.
In either case, claiming T-Mobile is not a good provider because they may not credit you for these downloads is terrible and further belittles your quality and value as a teacher.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by petalmom Posted Sat January 27, 2007 @ 6:59 AM
|
|
|
It always kills me how people think that just because they are a "good customer" that they should be treated special! How does paying your bill on time make you so vauled and deserving of special treatment?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Venice Posted Sat January 27, 2007 @ 4:50 AM
|
|
|
I'm not a teacher, just a parent, and perhaps I shouldn't be commenting here at all in light of recent events in my family's life, but as a parent, I have no problem referring to a thief as a future inmate, even if it was my own child.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Peregrina Posted Sat January 27, 2007 @ 2:53 AM
|
|
|
As a once - and hopefully future - teacher, I'm horrified that you would label your student a 'future inmate' on a public forum. I freely admit that teachers talk about their students. I can think of several students that, if one day I read their name in the jail log, I will not be at all surprised. However, to say so in a public forum is unprofessional and raises questions about your suitability to be a teacher.
All students, no matter their background, race, religion or economic standing, deserve to be treated as equal members of the class, not as future felons by the one person who is supposed to believe in them no matter what. Attitudes like yours, that some students are more or less worthy than others, is one of the reasons why I quit teaching four years ago. I had hoped that such mediavel ideas were isolated incidences. Sometimes I can be surprisingly naive.
TMobile is not responsible for your carelessness. Talk to the student in question and the parents. This could be your chance to save this student from a future of crime. All students deserve a chance, that's what teaching is about.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I would go after the student's parents. They should know what a miscreant their child is. Perhaps having to shell out money to cover their child's "entertainment" will teach them to keep a shorter lease on their "future inmate."
But the problem isn't T-Mobile's in any way shape or form. Why should they eat $75 in charges because of other people's errors?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Courtney C Posted Fri January 26, 2007 @ 5:29 PM
|
|
|
Apparently you posted this twice since the response I made to the same letter is still sitting there all alone, but I'll repost it here:
They did give you a credit. You admit that you were aware of the policy and even though they didn't have to, they were nice enough to credit you $15. If you know the student who took the phone, you need
to go after HIM. Hold HIM responsible for his actions. Why should T-mobile be responsible for a kid's actions? They were being nice to comp you the $15 and now you're giving them veiled threats to thank
them. Call the kid's parents and tell them they owe you $60. As one of the "many people" who read on PFB, I certainly don't see T-mobile in a bad light. In fact, I'm impressed that they offered you ANY credit. I know my cell phone company wouldn't.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|

|

|
so?
by d K Fri January 26, 2007 @ 6:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by eloh Posted Fri January 26, 2007 @ 4:40 PM
|
|
|
Hopefully, the charges were made at a reputable ringtone company that can be contacted, and would be willing to reverse them.
Bear in mind that T-Mobile does not normally refund charges for multiple downloads, so their customer service did come through for you already.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by CandyPickletoes Posted Fri January 26, 2007 @ 4:27 PM
|
|
|
I'm sorry, my son is in the 5th grade and if any one of his teachers EVER referred to him as a "future inmate" I would FREAK OUT!!!
Now, of course, my child knows better than to steal anything, but that is beside the point. If my son did steal it, I would reprimand him but I would be APPAULED if his teacher called him a "future inmate".
Sorry, I don't even know the remainder of your complaint so I can't comment on that.
Reply
|
|

|
umm
by PFBSUCKS Fri January 26, 2007 @ 6:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
Understood
by CandyPickletoes Mon January 29, 2007 @ 8:28 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Fri January 26, 2007 @ 3:32 PM
|
|
|
This letter is going to draw fire, I think.
I predict a stream of comments about how this letter was written by someone that should not be a 5th grade teacher.
As a teacher, surely you'd agree that it's inappropriate for you to refer to any student as "future inmate," even in jest. While a behavioral specialist (psychologist, clinical social worker) might be able to determine that a particular student has warning signs, making a statement like this is presumptuous.
I'm sure that some will comment how this letter is not well written, containing errors. Let me ask you a question: if a student turned this letter in for an assignment on writing letters (an appropriate task for a 5th grader), what grade would you give it? How much red ink would be splashed across it?
I'm sure that someone will point of that YOU are asking for sympathy and understanding, but are showing intolerance towards a student in your class.
Not me. Because I'm not going to pick on this letter.
Instead, I want to focus on the question of liability and responsibility.
At the time the phone was stolen, did T-Mobile have any responsibility? Did they put the phone in a place that it could be stolen? Were they given a chance to take some action to prevent the theft?
No. So, it's pretty clear that T-Mobile shouldn't have to "pay" for this, should they? Had you called them and said "will you guys take responsibility if I leave my phone in my desk?" I'm sure they would have said "no."
So, since they were not all all responsible for any aspect of the theft, should they be responsible for paying for the loss?
The responsibility lies, obviously, with the person that stole your phone. While it may be controversial for a teacher to sue a student, that may be a recourse. At the very least, if you have proof that the student did this, the school should take action. When I was a kid, if you stole something, you were suspended. And you were not allowed to come back until your family made restitution. Talk to your principal about this. If s/he refuses, then you'll need to take this up on your own.
Outside of that, you are the second to "blame." While I'm sure you took great care to secure your phone, you were the only one (outside of the thief) that did (or did not) do something to stop the theft. Did you lock up your cell phone? Leave it in an unlocked place? Did it fall out of your pocket?
I don't mean to blame you. Just saying that you bear more responsibility, if only because you were in possession of the phone, than T-Mobile.
Bad press? I hate to tell you this, but your complaint is not doing to do a dent in T-Mobile's business. They (like most other wireless carriers) have decided on a policy where, until the phone is reported stolen/missing, you're responsible for it. See above if you don't know why this is.
Honestly, if you'd written this letter as a polite request, and not a demand, I'd be behind you. It would be a nice thing for them to do. However, because you chose to be combative, my ability to be sympathetic dropped.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Banrion Posted Fri January 26, 2007 @ 1:04 PM
|
|
|
We'll see what kind of response you get from the rest of the community, but I hope that my child NEVER has a teacher like you. You do not call your students "future inmate" that is just wrong. As a guide and authority figure you should take this opportunity to council this child, not write him/her off as a criminal. 5th grade is what about 10 or 11 years old?
Second it was generous of T-mobile to refund anything as you say, you recovered the phone, so regardless of whether or not you wanted those games, you have them. You also feel like you shouldn't be held one bit responsible for what happened to your phone? That is ridiculous. It is your responsibility to keep your phone secure. T-mobile is offering a service by suspending activity when you allow your 5th grade class to steal your phone instead of letting them run the bill up. A cell phone is not like a credit card or check where all you need is a number that can be used anywhere. Without the physical phone charges can't be incurred. You weren't robbed at gunpoint, you weren't mugged, you were simply irresponsible with your belongings so you should be responsible for the bill.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|