HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Please read

Posted Mon August 11, 2008 8:59 pm, by jordan s. written to T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


I am upset that there are no towers around in the country areas of wisconsin.

I would like T-mobile to put more towers in the state of Wisconsin. Thank you for reading this message.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 22 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.
by ChristinaM Posted Thu August 14, 2008 @ 10:52 AM

in. Center of Manhattan. I get FAR from perfect coverage because of
the buildings. Nothing is win/win.

Reply

by Donno Posted Tue August 12, 2008 @ 11:46 PM

Wisconsin has about 1.8% of the US population, which means it is about
average, since the average state has 2%.

However, the population is most likely concentrated in the urban
areas. They would put more towers in the country if more people were
added to the country. Towers are expensive. They need to justify the
expense.

Have you ever looked at the map many providers have on their websites?
There are vast areas in the US that aren't covered.

There can be other reasons. My mom lived in a very populated area in
NJ, but the community she lived in voted against having a tower for
esthetic reasons. So, even though the area was densely populated,
cell phone coverage was very poor.

Reply


Very good Donno! by Harleycat Wed August 13, 2008 @ 8:33 AM


Who? by Donno Wed August 13, 2008 @ 11:35 PM

by Harleycat Posted Tue August 12, 2008 @ 8:31 AM

It's not just a matter of building towers. First of all they are
expensive. T-Mobile is going to want to know they will be able to
recoup their costs by getting additional customers. The other issue
is that some areas don't want more towers built. They are unsightly
and some people are convinced they are a health risk.

Are there other carriers with towers in these rural areas? If so, it
might be better to ask T-Mobile to enter into agreements with those
carriers to use their towers.

Reply


I always thought that... by dulynoted (aka duttycalls) Tue August 12, 2008 @ 10:22 AM

By the way by Samsa Tue August 12, 2008 @ 10:43 AM


I'll echo another poster.. by Harleycat Tue August 12, 2008 @ 1:41 PM

How Come? by Samsa Tue August 12, 2008 @ 2:05 PM


Because it's really irritating.. by Harleycat Tue August 12, 2008 @ 4:22 PM

And you don't by Samsa Tue August 12, 2008 @ 4:28 PM


What letter was it? by batmoody Tue August 12, 2008 @ 8:32 PM


I guess once you have been marked you are marked for life... by dulynoted (aka duttycalls) Tue August 12, 2008 @ 4:31 PM


Thanks so much...now I can enter the spelling bee and be proud! by dulynoted (aka duttycalls) Tue August 12, 2008 @ 4:28 PM


Yes, they can.. by Harleycat Tue August 12, 2008 @ 11:46 AM


by dulynoted (aka duttycalls) Posted Tue August 12, 2008 @ 8:16 AM

Personally I would love to see T-Mobile place more towers in the areas
surrounding Cleveland...eastern, western regions and suburbs. I can
get a phone call through 45 miles away to my sister who lives in
another county but cannot call the local hospital which is less than
25 miles away. Go figure.

Reply


In case of emergency... by Blackrack Tue August 12, 2008 @ 4:15 PM


I have done that...or called others to have them call my son... by dulynoted (aka duttycalls) Tue August 12, 2008 @ 4:30 PM

By the way by Samsa Tue August 12, 2008 @ 7:37 PM


We've been Samsatized! by RedheadwGlasses Wed August 13, 2008 @ 1:08 PM


By the way by Nate. Wed August 13, 2008 @ 10:13 PM
by Calvin w. Posted Tue August 12, 2008 @ 12:16 AM

Now when you be a little more specific. Country areas is very vuage.
Every cell phone company does not have coverage everywhere despite
what you see on tv. If a given area only has a population of 100 or
less in a 5 mile radius, the chance of having coverage is slim to
none. Unless is near a highway or tourist spot. Each tower to be built
roughly costs about 250,000 to be built and not to mention the upkeep
costs and what they have to pay the land owner each month to have it
there. I near by resident who has a farm ontop of a hill over my home
city has one in his farm from att and they pay him about 8,000 a year
to have it there. So depending on how many people are there you might
not get one. If you would like service to be improved, have yourself
and everyone you know with tmo call and say hey I spend time in these
spots xyz and not getting coverage, they will file a service request
for it and the more of those that are in tmo might plan to get
coverage there if there are many requests for it rather then none.
While not a direct resolution might help coverage seeker. Good day

Reply




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2009 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada