|
|
I Am A Disgruntled Long T-Mobile Standing Customer
Posted Mon January 29, 2007 12:00 pm, by Donna L. written to T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
I have been a customer for 4+ years. I have been annoyed in the past regarding the opportunities for new customers to get these great bargains on new phones but loyal customers are not afforded opportunites except to upgrade and extend contracts. I have 3 phones on my account, one was a recent addition when I convinced my sister to become a T-Mobile customer. Dec 06 I upgraded my phone to the Samsung 629 slider phone and also purchased one for my daughter. The price was great and the phone was chosen for myself because of the large font. Most cell phones I have trouble reading the displays and often can't make out the phone #'s. My daughter just thought the slider function was pretty cool. 2 weeks ago, my phone was lost while on a business trip and I was unable to replace it immediately due to finances so I just replaced the Sims card and used an old phone that I had laying around. My mother had to undergo emergency surgery this past weekend and I had to make an emergency trip home so I needed a reliable phone for the trip and when I went to the T-Mobile store I was unable to purchase a phone that met my needs. My slider phone had tripled in price for me since I had already used my "upgrade" the previous month. I had not purchased insurance on the phone because I am on a budget and that expense seemed un-necessary as I had in the past 4+ years never broke, lost or had a phone stolen. I ended up with a phone that I had to settle for since the models I could afford that met my needs were not available in the store. I called customer service and though they appreciate my longevity in service they can't offer me a very good discount to re-purchase my slider phone since the specials are over.. When I visited this site for the first time I was able to link to a site that would give me a free slider phone and send me a $50 gift card as well if I signed up for new service. That seems very unfair that new customers can get free phones while even with my upgrade I paid $50 but now must pay $150-160 dollars for the same phone. That makes me want to move my service when my contracts are up so I can get the newest and most advanced phones for free with a provider who is offering specials to new customers.
Replace my phone at a decent price even the $50 that I paid last month. If you want customer loyalty then you need to exhibit loyalty to your customer as well, it works both ways.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 25 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Thu February 1, 2007 @ 2:43 PM
|
|
|
You received the discount once, like all new customers do ONCE! They gave you $100 off on a phone, you lost it, and now you want another deal? That makes no sense. WHY SHOULD YOU GET 2 DISCOUNTS before the contract is up? Are you special?
They gave you that $100 off in exchange for a contract. They lived up to their end of the contract, did you? NOPE.
Why should they pay for your carelessness? You lost the phone and did not have insurance.
If you can't afford cellular service with all of the bells and whistles, that is your problem not theirs.
They do not make a profit on selling phones even at full price. They sell the phones at cost so they can make money on airtime.
If you bought a sweater on sale for 1/2 off and 6 months later you lost the sweater, is the store obligated to give you a new one at 1/2 off? IT IS THE SAME THING. That is not how life works.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Thu February 1, 2007 @ 12:54 AM
|
|
|
"I had not purchased insurance on the phone because I am on a budget and that expense seemed un-necessary as I had in the past 4+ years never broke, lost or had a phone stolen." So, you didn't know your life was about to change. God strikes at funny times.
"I called customer service and though they appreciate my longevity in service they can't offer me a very good discount to re-purchase my slider phone since the specials are over."
Customer service was "understanding" and you didn't pay for insurance. What else is there to discuss? There is a lesson in here, and it isn't for T-Mobile to learn.
Regarding your comment below, do you really think people are wasting time making "fake" responses to your post about losing a cell phone and getting upset because the co. won't give you a discount on a new one? Do you think we work for T-Mobile? Surely you jest.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
The people responding aren't doing anything except giving you honest feedback. And if "evidence" doesn't belong in the LETTER TO THE COMPANY, then where does it belong?
You just keep tsk tsk tsking yourself. I can see you doing it right now.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Donna L. Posted Wed January 31, 2007 @ 11:40 AM
|
|
|
I love the responses I got to my posting! Most of if not all sound like T-Mobile lobbyists soliciting the court of public opinion. There are too many trite, scripted responses in each of these letters for me to believe that the verbage is anything other than party line responses to key phrases or words. If my letter would have been taken as a whole instead of pouncing on different aspects of it then it would have been better understood. As for my complaint not having merit, I understood that this site is for airing complaints or personal dissatisfaction with a product or service therefore I don't have to bring forth evidence or numbers to prove my complaint, this is a forum for personal experience and perspective and not a court of law.
In regards to cell phone companies taking a "loss" on discounted cell phones, I also worked in retail for many years and I know that "retail" prices are often marked up considerably over the "cost" of the items and when these items are marketed in bulk then the individual cost of these items go down considerably. Also coming from customer related service industries I know that the businesses I worked for valued brand loyalty and often went to great lengths to keep these sustainers who are the core of any strong business foundation I come from a generation where brand loyalty was considered a valuable asset to any marketer. T-Mobile has made a lot of money off of me and I am not worried that they would suffer financially should they provide a little extra customer service. I am not asking for a free phone only the opportunity to replace a phone at a reasonable purchase price and not the marked up retail. My needs that were also questioned are related to poor eyesight even with corrective reading glasses and the phones that I need have larger font therefore making them easier to read. Also in regards to the insurance, when I spoke with a T-Mobile Customer Service Rep. they indicated that even with the insurance I would be paying more than I could afford to replace the slider phone. I still remain an unhappy customer but I am happy that the responders apparently have had nothing but good experiences with their cell phone providers if in fact they are true responders.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Why do people think they deserve as many free phones as they want whenever they want them? Nobody cares that you've been with T-mobile for four years. Customers who've been with T-mobile for 10 years don't get free phones whenever they want one, why should you? The price you pay when you upgrade is actually BELOW what T-mobile pays for the handset. They're losing money on it because by signing the contract you're committing to pay a profitable monthly bill for the next two years. If they go and give you another phone below their cost they're basically cutting into their profits for no real gain. No responsible company does that.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by eloh Posted Tue January 30, 2007 @ 11:07 AM
|
|
|
If a new customer lost their phone, they would have to replace it at full retail as well -
T-mobile provides discounted cellphone prices at a loss - all cellphone companies do. When you purchased your first 2 slider phones, they probably took a loss on those phones. That's why they can't afford to keep selling you phones for $50 dollars. No business can afford to sell things at a loss repeatedly without restrictions - and in this case the restriction was once every upgrade cycle (a year or 22 months for a 2 year contract)
Do you have travel insurance, or have it provided through a travel organization such a credit card or AAA? They may cover the cost of replacing the phone, since it was lost on a business trip. Alternatively, you could wait a year or 22 months to receive another upgrade offer to replace your phone.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Joalesh Posted Tue January 30, 2007 @ 5:42 AM
|
|
|
I have to agree with what the other posters have said. Yes, it isn't fair but who said life is?
As a former CSR for a mobile phone company, I got calls like this almost every hour. People demanding a new phone for free even though they were the one who lost it/broke it/got it wet.
A cell phone is a luxury not a necessity.
Oh and just because you have been with T-Mobile for 4+ years doesn't mean anything to them.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Lee H. Posted Mon January 29, 2007 @ 10:21 PM
|
|
|
A lot of the other posters have already beaten up on you Donna and, frankly, I'm going to do the same thing.
You admit you subscribed to a service and forgone the insurance. The risk you take is handling the cost of replacement yourself, regardless of what that cost is. Your claim that you were under a strict budget may mean that you couldn't afford NOT to pay the insurance premiums.
You have no choice to both pay the ETF and switch providers which, I think you will find, is more expensive than T-Mobile or you pay for the cost of the new phone. If you find that either of these options are not desirable, then you're stuck with what you have.
This is not a site to write complaints without merit. Please do not use it as such.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Mon January 29, 2007 @ 3:26 PM
|
|
|
Life is unfair, Donna. It's a fact that wireless companies offer smoking deals to new customers to get them into contracts. It's also a fact that T-Mobile doesn't care that you are a "long standing customer".
You bought a new phone with your upgrade credit, didn't buy insurance and lost the phone. There is no reason for T-Mobile to replace your phone or offer you any special incentives because they don't care about customer loyalty. So go ahead and move your service when your contract is up so you can get the "newest and most advanced phones for free" - - but I would consider insurance next time if I were you - - even if you are on a budget.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Agreed!
by tickytack Tue January 30, 2007 @ 7:54 AM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Mon January 29, 2007 @ 2:32 PM
|
|
|
Sigh.
I'm sorry, but these letters are soooo common.
First, I'm not sure what "meets my needs" is. Even the cheapest phone will let you make phone calls. What other "needs" can a personally really have? I can see, I guess, needing a phone with a browser/data service for some people. But, in the end, what could you possibly need in a more expensive phone?
I'm not sure why people think that they deserve to get free/discounted phones whenever they want. I just can't figure it out.
Let's make this simple: the reason that wireless companies give out free phones is to attract new customers and put them under contract. Hopefully, for long enough to recover the money they lost on giving you a free phone.
They give existing customers occasional upgrades to KEEP them as customers. In other words, to extend the contract.
Why in the world would a company, that has you under contract, want to cut you a deal to replace a phone that you lost?
They offered you an insurance plan, but you turned it down.
That's what insurance is. You pay for and hope you never need it.
Speaking of which, have you tried your homeowners insurance? They might pay for a phone replacement, subject to any deductibles (most likely more than what a phone costs).
OK... now for the secret... if you really want a free phone and you're under contract, you gotta find a reason (other than you being a good customer or threats of leaving when the contract is over) that T-Mobile will benefit from doing this for you. Show them actual math based on real numbers to show that giving you a free phone is going to make them more money. No fair saying "I'll be a customer for a long time" or "I'll tell others how good you are." Unless you're willing to sign up for a 4-year contract, your promises mean nothing.
If you can't make a HARD case for why they need to give you the phone, they have NO REASON to do it.
That's the way things are.
You have other options:
(1) Get mad at them, pay the ETF, and go elsewhere. It might be cheaper than paying for a new phone. For example, if you need to pay $150 in ETF, it might be better to just pay it and get a $200 phone free from Verizon or Sprint.
(2) Buy a used phone on eBay.
(3) Decide that the "slider function" isn't cool enough to spend money on it and get a more basic phone.
(4) Keep the low-end phone you've been using. It works, doesn't it?
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Courtney C Posted Mon January 29, 2007 @ 12:07 PM
|
|
|
"That makes me want to move my service when my contracts are up so I can get the newest and most advanced phones for free with a provider who is offering specials to new customers."
And that's exactly why New Customer deals are so much better. And guess what? When you're existing customer at THAT provider, you won't get New Customer deals. That's the way the business works. You lost your phone, you chose not to get insurance, you take the responsibility. Why would they even offer insurance if they just gave away new phones at the cheap prive everytime someone lost theirs? The rules are the same for everyone no matter how good a customer you think you are.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by tickytack Posted Mon January 29, 2007 @ 10:30 AM
|
|
|
You lost your phone.
Who's fault is that?
I don't see why T-Mobile should take a loss because of your lack of responsibility.
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|