|
|
15 Year Old drops her camera and can't get a new one (or has to pay for repair)
Posted Thu June 28, 2007 1:47 pm, by Lisa C. written to Target Corporation
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
On December 22, 2007 I purchased a red Kodak V603 digital camera for my 15 year old daughter for Christmas. I also purchased an extended warranty for $29.00 of which one of your employees suggested. Needless to say, my daugther dropped her camera in March 2007. Ever since March, I've been trying to work with the warranty people. They would put me on hold for 17 minutes, give me wrong information, etc. Finally, in May I received the information to send the camera to them for either the repairs or a gift card to Target for my daughter to get a new camera. The warranty people "Precision Camera" phoned me today (6/28/07) to tell me that the camera had impact damage and we would have to pay $128.34 for the repair. I told them to send the camera back to me. It is now useless. Why would I purchase a 3 year extended service plan, through you, at your employee's suggestion, that does not cover this? Of course, in fine print it states "Failures, damage or loss caused by general conditions of the environment or any physical force or object that is external, whether accidental or intentional..." Well, I'm very dissatisfied with not only Precision Camera but Target as well. All of the frustration that I have endured because of this camera and this warranty, isn't worth it. Yes, my daughter dropped it, but there is no way that the damage should equal to $128.34 or that I should even have to pay a cent. We thought she would get a gift card to Target and she had every intention of purchasing the same camera again. She's 15 years old and that is all they do is take pictures. I'll know better in the future when purchasing an electronic item.
I would like Target to either add a clause into the extended warranty about dropping the camera so people will know (the print is so small); I would also like them to repair the camera at no charge to me or send my daughter the gift card for a new one. This camera was brand new and she only used it for 3 months. I am very disappointed with the way this whole thing has been handled.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 67 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by Lisa Cavasina Posted Thu July 19, 2007 @ 10:11 AM
|
|
|
Since everyone had such NEGATIVE things to say about my parenting skills let me clue everyone in on the progress. Guess what? After explaining the situtation to Target, they have agreed to accept the camera back and issue us a gift card in the amount of $250.00. This camera came out of her hands onto a tabletop (not a far distance) - it was practically brand new and this all started in March 07 because of the incompetent people that work for the extended service plan giving me the run around, I'm just getting this settled. I was willing to pay for the repairs, we accepted my daughter's blame and took responsibility but don't tell me that she did $128.00 worth of damage from such a short fall---that's bull!
I have always owned Kodak cameras and am very knowledgeable about cameras - I knew the amount they quoted me to fix the camera was astronomical. It was not fair!
So for all of you rude people who don't know me or my (very responsible) daughter, who took full blame for it slipping out of her hands, there you go! We are very pleased with the outcome. Nobody deserves to go through what I went through with the extended service people (the plan which I was talked into buying from Target's salesperson). A lesson was learned in all of this - one of them being that people are very judgmental and rude on this website.
Thank you.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Ben Stein Posted Mon July 9, 2007 @ 11:49 AM
|
|
|
When you own something, and then break it; Isn't that your own fault? I believe warranties should cover problems that are not your fault. This might be a good time to teach your 15 year old the consequences of her actions. I think that using her age to make this situation seem unfair, just shows how irresponsible you are. Teach your kid to be more careful with the things she owns.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Sun July 8, 2007 @ 11:05 PM
|
|
|
I don't know if they have them at your stores, but I work at Staples and my store carries a rather cheap digital camera specifically for younger people. Might want to consider that.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Buddy Posted Sun July 8, 2007 @ 10:13 PM
|
|
|
December 22, 2007.... you're into time travel, I see.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Batman Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 7:36 PM
|
|
|
This is the exact reason most people are advised to NOT purchase extended warranties.
I was at a local Toys R Us, and the manager was pushing extended warranties. He said, "No matter what you do, it will be replaced". BUT, when you read the warranty, you see he flat out LIED! There were no misunderstandings here. I heard him tell this to a person, and I asked, Did you just say if you run over something, they will replace it or refund the purchase price? He said Yes. I restated my question, "So, let's say I don't want this item within the length of the warranty, anymore, I can run my car over it, and they will replace it, or refund my money?" Again, "Yes". I read the warranty info, because I buy lots of stuff that cant be returned if I dont like it, so, an extended warranty that would allow this would be very beneficial. As I suspected, HE LIED! Accidental damages due to our negligence was NOT covered.
When it comes to these waranties, I suggest asking the store manager, explicitly, then get it in writing, then, read the warranty. If the mgr refuses to give it in writing, I suspect that's because they are simply trying to push warranties. If it's not in writing, then you'll have a hard time proving later, "Well, the mgr. said....."
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Semi-inspiredDrummer Posted Thu July 5, 2007 @ 12:49 AM
|
|
|
The warranty, despite being written in a teeny-tiny font, explicitly stated that this type of damage is not covered. Therefore, the powers that be had every right to tell you that you would have to pay for the repair job.
Sorry, but it's not Target's fault that your child dropped her camera. It's not the warranty company's fault that your child dropped her camera. It's your child's fault.
This could be a great opportunity to teach your child how to make responsible buying decisions. You could teach her that, whenever somebody offers her a warranty plan, she should read the entire contract before she buys/signs it. You could also teach her that it's not somebody else's fault when we do silly things with our stuff.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Vaughn Blaylock Posted Wed July 4, 2007 @ 3:25 PM
|
|
|
Translation:
My daughter dropped a comera and broke it. All future Target customers should pay for this (since Target's cost of business is inevitably passed on to its customers) because my daughter is incapable of taking responsibility for her own mistakes.
Further, I have raised my daughter to believe that she is not responsible for her own actions, and that any mistakes made must find a third party to be blamed.
In other words, I have failed as a parent. Miserably so.
Reply
|
|

|
Disturbing
by Lisa Cavasina Thu July 19, 2007 @ 10:14 AM
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by ChrisH Posted Wed July 4, 2007 @ 12:57 PM
|
|
|
Okay, wait. Hold the phone. Stop the presses. You want Target (or the warranty company, or both) to pay for for your daughter's negative actions? You surely can't be serious.
So with that reasoning, does it make a difference if the person that dropped the camera was over 18?
Since Target didn't have the opportunity to be there to "catch" the camera (or raise your child for you), why would anyone fault them for the damage?
Reply
|
|

|
Age
by Lisa Cavasina Thu July 19, 2007 @ 10:17 AM
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Becks Posted Mon July 2, 2007 @ 8:02 AM
|
|
|
I thought a warranty covered DEFECTS in the equipment, not damage caused by someone dropping a camera.
In effect, you are stating that had your daughter smashed her camera to bits with a hammer, you should have received a refund....
that is not how warranties work.
I think you are in the wrong here, not Target.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|

|
Oh...
by Becks Mon July 2, 2007 @ 9:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by donno Posted Mon July 2, 2007 @ 12:01 AM
|
|
|
Why should Target go against the stated policy? Because it is in fine print? Surely your complaint is a joke.
Your disappointment stems from not understanding your warranty, not from anything Target did wrong.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Loper Posted Sat June 30, 2007 @ 11:17 AM
|
|
|
Lisa,
The best thing you can teach your daughter is RESPONSIBILITY and the best way to do that is to allow her to suffer the consequences of her carelessness.
No extended warranty EVER covers damage by dropping, smashing, running over or throwing a piece of electronic equipment. As a rational adult, you already know this and should be embarrassed and ashamed of yourself for throwing a tantrum over something you KNEW they weren't going to cover.
I too am very disappointed with the way this whole thing has been handled. You advocating for your daughter when she was clearly at fault send the wrong message. Basically, you have just told her that it's OK to be careless, you just scream and yell and pitch a fit and someone will give in and let you have your way.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by shannont1110 Posted Sat June 30, 2007 @ 10:27 AM
|
|
|
Sorry that this has happened to you- but she really must have dropped it hard for it to no longer work and for you to need a new one. I've got an Olympus digital camera that I've had for at least 5 years now, and my son (who's 7) is always playing with it-taking pictures, etc. Now granted, the outers don't look great, but it's still working. Last summer it got left out in a box on a carport when we moved, and was found 4 months later (we thought it'd gotten tossed accidently during our move).
And if you're not sure about the "small print" ask. Of course the employee is going to try to sell you an extended warranty- they get credit, etc. for all the extra sales they do.
And another thing- if you buy a car, and the paint gets scratched, are you going to ask the car dealer or mfg for a new one because your insurance or warranty isn't going to cover it?
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Katy M Posted Sat June 30, 2007 @ 12:55 AM
|
|
|
Accidental damage is not covered by any typical extended warranties that I've seen. However, Best Buy has recently started offering a special accidental damage coverage on its digital cameras and laptops. This service plan costs more than the basic service plan, but it might be something you should look into for your next camera purchase. Target is not obligated to give you anything for this camera.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Peregrina Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 10:54 PM
|
|
|
This is yet another special snowflake who just KNOWS that the rules DO NOT apply to her. How silly of us not to realize it sooner.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by jmg110 Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 9:31 PM
|
|
|
YOUR DAUGHTER SHOULD WRITE THIS LETTER HERSELF. SHES BIG ENOUGH TO OWN A DIGITAL CAMEREA SHE SHOULD FIGHT HER OWN BATTLES. AND NO TARGET IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. WELL WAIT NEITHER IS YOUR DAUGHTER.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
No offence, but it is not Target's fault you and your daughter did not read the fine print, also if you and your daughter cannot take responsibility for your actions maybe she should not have a digital camera.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Rhet Canter Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 4:54 PM
|
|
|
So, since your 15 year old daughter dropped her camera and broke it, how is that Targets problem? And why are they responsible for something clearly outside of the warranty? They aren't. Plain and simple. Why didn't you or someone close to you point that out to you since you didn't obviously see it. And why does it matter that your daughter is 15 years old? That makes no sense to me or has any bearing on the outcome. It is worse the younger they are? Less severe the older they are? You don't have a claim or issue to stand on. It's too bad you wasted your own precious time trying to get something that you're not entitled to.
Better luck next time!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by A A Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 3:33 PM
|
|
|
So if they included impact damage, what would stop a consumer from breaking it on purpose with a hammer to get a new one just before the warranty expired?
Warranties cover the workmanship of the product, not the damage sustained by use other than what it was intended for. A warranty is not the same thing as insurance.
If they covered impact damaged, a pissed off customer could buy one and break the camera over and over again and keep getting it replaced for a new one. For all they know your daughter did it on purpose.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Tough Muffin Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 2:25 PM
|
|
|
" She's 15 years old and that is all they do is take pictures. I'll know better in the future when purchasing an electronic item."
-----
Maybe try buying a camera and not a camera phone for her if all she wants to do is take pictures.
"Needless to say", you didn't think about that option, did you?
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Since this OP already got the company to cave, I'll share some info I learned with those who actually take responsibility for their actions (and those of their minor children).
About 5 years ago we purchased what was then a top-of-the-line digital camera. While I was using it to take pictures of some items I was selling on eBay, I dropped it, on the carpet. It ceased to work. I knew it was my fault, but I immediately called the camera repair shop in town and asked them what to do. I knew my boyfriend (we were not married yet) would be peeved to say the VERY least. The guy at the camera shop told me to try to re-charge the battery for 24 hours and then try again. Sure as shootin', I charged the battery and the camera was good as new. The impact of the drop had somehow knocked the charge out of the battery. I would love it if someone could explain this to me, but I'll tell you I was just glad that I wasn't going to have to spend $$$ on a repair!
About 6 months ago I dropped the darn thing again and this time on a concrete floor. I actually heard pieces rattling around inside the unit. This time, it was beyond repair. I ended up finding a refurb of the same camera (we have all the accessories) on eBay for $60. Much better than the original price we paid, but I knew any warranty would not cover MY clumsiness!
Reply
|
|

|
Cave......
by Lisa Cavasina Thu July 19, 2007 @ 10:39 AM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 12:01 PM
|
|
|
I have to agree with others, Lisa. No matter what you thought you were buying, you did buy a plan that explicitly excludes damage caused by dropping the camera, and unless your 15-year-old is substantially more coordinated than most of the 15-year-olds I've ever known (and I somehow doubt that since you appear to believe that it is so obvious that we should know without being told that your daughter would drop it 3 months after receiving it), you should not only have asked about damage due to dropping but also insisted that you be shown where in the contract dropping was covered. By all means complain to Target about getting bad information from their employee, but what someone *said* to you is going to be disputed, unlike the *written* document you got which *explicitly* says if you drop it you're on your own.
I'm willing to bet that when they said they'd be repairing the camera or giving your kid a gift card they didn't know what exactly had happened to the camera. When someone makes you a conditional promise based on a reasonable belief about something and it then turns out that the reasonable belief is false, the promise can vanish.
Consider it an unpleasant and expensive lesson for your daughter about the importance of (a) taking care of one's things (and I recognize that this was an accident, but still) and (b) reading contracts before signing them. Believe me, she'll have many opportunities to feel grateful about these lessons throughout her life. Maybe in December you will buy her another one and she will be incredibly careful with it and be able to enjoy it for years.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Jeanie Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 11:58 AM
|
|
|
I have a reputation for dropping electronics myself. And if I demanded a replacement for every Walkman or Discman that broke when I dropped it... well, suffice it to say that your daughter should either pay for the repair or buy a new camera out of her allowance.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 10:21 AM
|
|
|
I think you mean you purchased it in December '06.. since we haven't reached December '07 yet.. I'm not sure about Target's warranty info, but at the store I work at, we have two plans. One that covers internal defects/issues, and a accident protection plan. The only high priced electronic I've bought from Target was an iPod a few years ago, so I woulnd't know the other info about the camera, but I'm thinking it doesn't include accidental drops. At 15 all they do it take pictures? When I was 15 I wasn't taking pictures... It's not the company's fault that she dropped it. All warranty plans have the fine print, thats why you read it before you purchase it, you don't just go on what the sales associate says to you. And as for the price of repair, you think that amount is too steep. Well you'd be surprised at how much things cost to repair these days. I think this might be my longest post ever! woohoo! lol
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Yet another child who is going to grow up feeling entitled. This entitlement disease is spreading like the plague in our country. If parents do not quickly step up to the plate and actually *GASP* parent, I shudder to think what the world is coming to.
YOUR child dropped the camera, the warranty does not cover impact damage (dropping the camera would likely result in impact damage), so really what part are you not clear on?
Step up to the plate here. Instead of teaching your child how to get around things and short cut their way through life, how about teaching some responsibility, like we are responsible for our actions. That means if you drop your camera, instead of throwing a hissy fit/temper tantrum like a toddler would, you have to do without your camera and save up your allowance or get a part time job to replace it.
Things are not always someone elses fault. Bad things happen, teach your daughter how to deal with it. It is amazing how much more careful people (especially young people) are with things that they have to/had to pay for.
That is all.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Max Power Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 10:10 AM
|
|
|
More and more people are taking less and less responsibility for their own actions, its kinda scary if you think about it.
Personally, if the fine print of a contract or whatever I'm about to purchase is too small to read, then chances are that I wont buy it.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Alitax Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 10:10 AM
|
|
|
This is why you read contracts very carefully before signing them...small print and all. If you don't understand the contents of the contract, inquire, take notes, and have some kind of written proof.
This is also the sound of personal responsibility dying. Is it not well understood that a warranty for defective merchandise has nothing to do with a warranty that allows you to be careless with your expensive electronic toys?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Mike Z. Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 9:55 AM
|
|
|
Anyone else notice this camera was purchased 6 months from now? Sounds like this is a problem for an episode of the X-files (cue eerie music).
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Sava Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 9:16 AM
|
|
|
I purchased a new cell phone in February of this year, a flip-phone, and have the warranty on it. I accidentally dropped it and the hinge that attaches the 2 halves broke, leaving it in 2 pieces. I wasn't entitled to a replacement or free repair either, because I caused the damage, and it wasn't some defect in the phone. However, I was able to get a repair for $98, much less than what a new phone would cost me.
Same thing applies here - the warranty only covers defects in the camera, not damage caused by the user, unfortunately. Just curious, how much was the camera when you bought it? Was the repair cost that unreasonable? I agree that the situation sucks, but they did nothing wrong.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Cor H Posted Fri June 29, 2007 @ 7:58 AM
|
|
|
The OP wants a clause about dropping the camera put into the warranty.
There is a clause about dropping the camera. The OP quoted it. "Damage...caused by...any physical force or object that is external, whether accidental or intentional.". Basically, if it is hit by something (like a floor), even accidentally, the warranty does not cover it.
The size of the print is irrelevant. I imagine it could be size 20 font with flashing neon letters and consumers would still insist they were cheated.
As to why the consumer would purchase an extended warranty that does not cover impact damage, only she would know. However, it appears she did so and it happened because she failed to read the warranty.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by S. Brown Posted Thu June 28, 2007 @ 8:28 PM
|
|
|
Unfortunately it is your responsibility, as the consumer, to understand the terms and conditions of the extended warranty you purchased.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Unless your warranties (regular and extended) cover damage caused by the user, you're out of luck. I dropped my brand-new digital camera last month (I'd had it less than 3 weeks) while on vacation, and I sure don't expect Canon to ship me a new one.
You seem awfully self-entitled.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
just because
by Angelic Princess:) Fri June 29, 2007 @ 6:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Jeffrey Posted Thu June 28, 2007 @ 3:01 PM
|
|
|
I'm confused. What did the fine print say? There's something missing from your quote. Did they say the INCLUDE or EXCLUDE accidental damage?
If it says "exclude" then it's exclude. That means that you don't get a free repair or gift card. The $29, in your case, was a waste of money. But it was your decision to buy the warranty. No one can bail you out of that.
On the other hand, if you were told that drops would be covered (and they aren't), you can make a complaint that the warranty was sold to you fraudulently. I, myself, have experience where I was told a lie about a warranty and was denied access to the written warranty until after I'd paid. I was able to get a refund of the warranty. But that was only because the consumer affairs department DID find sufficient proof that the salesperson fraudulently represented the warranty.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by azgirl Posted Thu June 28, 2007 @ 2:48 PM
|
|
|
Most service plans do not cover damage caused by the owner, even when they're only 15.
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|