|
|
Walgreens treating those that matter the most with the least respect
Posted Wed February 11, 2009 2:41 am, by k s. written to Walgreen's
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
Walgreens is alienating some of the most important people in their workforce! We received an email from corporate headquarters on 2/10/09. Effective immediately all assistant managers will no longer be guaranteed 4 hours overtime every week. This on average results in around a $400.00 a month pay cut for assistant managers. This in no way affects Store managers or exa's who are salary. How unfair is this that lower management is the only ones affected?! In my particular store, the store manager does little but sit in the office. The exa is worse..... it is a miracle in itself that she is an exa! The other assistant and I work circles around her! It is ironic that those who do the most grunt labor and have to "babysit" the kids are the first to get punished! I may have to work at this hell hole, but now I will no longer purchase it's stock, or participate in it's profit sharing. That may hurt me in the long run you say, but I personally need that money now, not later thanks to the boneheads in upper management who's wallets are still getting fat despite tough times! Come on Walgreens wake up! In your stores your salaried management seem to do less work than your hard working management that has to clock in. Why are we not taking away store management and exa bonuses instead of the little guy taking the hit?! Oh, and to add insult to injury they are not eliminating those hours from the store all together. Those hours are going to the regular employees who make less! They figure the cheaper labor will save them..... but what happens when those employees have more on their plates because of less management presence?! They are going to say that they don't get paid enough to do what is asked! Oh, and why can't we make pharmacists take a pay cut of a dollar or two an hour?! Oh yeah, that's right...... those pre-madonnas would freak if they didn't bring in over $125,000 a year! How could they ever survive on less than that?! They sound like the spoiled crybabies in sports who complain that several million a year isn't enough to live on! Walgreen's seriously needs to rethink this strategy. I hope I'm around long enough to see this come around and bite them in the ass! Excuse me now while I go look in the classifieds for a better job with more respect for their managemnent!
Grasp their head with both hands firmly, then try and yank their head out. Decisions are not made wisely in the dark with the lack of oxygen!
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 49 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by S K. Posted Sun July 5, 2009 @ 11:06 AM
|
|
|
I know what you are talking about but think about it,not every store manager is the same,not every ex is the same and not every assistant manager is the same.I am working right now with some assistant managers that are very lazy and you can't do anything to change that but write them up.My service clerk does more then them .It is not Walgreens that does this it is who ever is above you that allows lazy people to get away with it.I think this is a great company to work for ,yes I think they should have stoped building more stores instead off cutting the OT and hours but maybe they didn't expect this economy crisis? ...Any way as much as it is frustrating its worse in some other companies but look at the economy !Lets just be gratefull that we have a job. Walgreens takes good care off their employees.And I am sure as soon as the economy gets better they will reward us all.We all need to stick together trough this.I work almost ten years for this company and I would never leave it.I seen it all and I tell you its not different somewhere else.You will always find the bad guy.As far as the pharmacists :) yes they are acting like they are the best thing and yes I think they could take a paycut but you need to think BIG ,pharmacie is Walgreens.Thats where we make most profit we can't afford loosing pharmacists.And also,they have doctorate degree thats why they get paid so much.If you want that salary go back to school or keep up the good work and Walgreens gives you chance to make that without doctorate degree.:) Good Luck
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by sgtsharkey Posted Fri February 13, 2009 @ 5:17 AM
|
|
|
"I am a Walgreens store manager. Today I had to tell my assistants that they were getting a 14% pay cut based on what they were offered as their base pay. I hated every minute of it. Most of the employees in the store are not the primary bread winners of their household. Assistants are in many cases. They earn good money for their efforts, which in turn generate good profits for the company based on the customer service they offer. If morale on behalf of the assistants is to decline, their job performance will suffer. Resulting in more customer dissatisfaction. This is not what I got promoted to store manager for, giving bad news to trusted staff. When I was an assistant if I was given a 14% pay cut, I, as the primary breadwinner of the family, I don't know if we would have been able to survive. This is a very shortsighted view by Walgreens. In reality it will benefit the company by over 100 million per year but at what cost? Service declining, morale declining and overall performance declining. This is one of the worst days I have ever spent at the company that once I would have praised as one of the most employee friendly companies in the nation. Ever since Walgreens has not been headed by someone with the last name of Walgreen we have become more a corporation and less a vocation. Since Kevin and Charles III have left, it has become increasingly difficult to justify our existence, without using the word profit. Profit used to be a good word that showed that we were providing a service to the community and were shown loyalty by that community. It has since just become another word to show that as a corporation we are an investment. Investment also used to be a good word. It showed that we are good stewards not only of the investment made in us but of the Walgreens name, a name which meant quality service, a friendly smile and helpful face but of that something extra. Above and beyond. Serving our customers needs whenever possible. Now we are a corporate entity. Sad."
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by sgtsharkey Posted Thu February 12, 2009 @ 9:53 PM
|
|
|
There is a quantitative correlation between labor (costs) and production (profits). What occurred Monday at Walgreens was not simply the "elimination of overtime."
It was a massive across the board pay cut.
Managers are scheduled for 44 hours per week. Tasks such as revisions, resets, price changes, ordering, etc, are factored based upon a 44-hour work week. The compensation package for assistant managers was figured on a 44-hour work week, four of which hours were overtime.
I know of no assistant manager, or EXA, or young store manager who was NOT assured and promised 44 hours a week upon being hired. What happened this week is that assistant managers just took between a $4800 and $5500 pay cut--and for absolutely no acceptable reason.
Deerfield idiots spend the money stores make faster than the stores can make it. Stores succeed IN SPITE of Deerfield. Walgreens incessant addiction to acquisition is frightening. And the money some of these acquisitions is losing, such as Take Care and WHS isn't frightening--it's nightmarish.
Last year in fiscal 2008, Jeff Rein approved the creation of $2.9 million in NEW salaried senior executive positions in Deerfield that had no predecessor, nor any clear responsibility. This does not include the additional senior exec positions created through acquisition of companies and the subsequent promotion of THEIR senior executives.
Deerfield feeds itself before it feeds its help. Problem is, the stores can operate without Deerfield. Charles Walgreen set up his company for stores to run autonomously. Dose of Dave, Rein, and now Wasson have completely destroyed that--while at the same time, talking out of both sides of their mouths.
Deerfield will still get bonuses--bonuses paid for via the pay cuts inflicted on assistant managers.
If Walgreens store management was unionized, 95% of all Walgreens stores would be closed this week due to management picketing their stores.
Assistant managers (MGTs) have been working 44 hours (4 OT) for at least the 15+ years I've been with the company. This 4 hours OT was a bit of compensation for the amount of hard hours, nights, weekends, holidays, etc. It is part of the salary package you were informed of upon taking the job. For most MGTs, this is a gross (no pun intended) pay cut of approx. 15-18%
My store manager said he would rather cut hours from SS clerks and give MORE hours to our MGT crew because we are all hard working, reliable, knowledgeable and experienced. This is NOT a good long term decision. Service will suffer from a demoralized management crew, and people qualified and interested in the job might think twice about a position that paid $42k last week, $35k this week. The economy won't be this bad forever.
I'm an assistant manager for Walgreens too.
First, they cut our store hours and we take it out of the Cosmetics Department. Okay, whatever. Cosmetics is only a huge part of our Self Serve sales, but whatever, theres some guy sitting in an office somewhere that knows more than I. Its okay though, MGTs can cover it, right?
Second, they cut pharmacy tech hours. But apparently thats okay too... MGTs can jump in any time and help out. I'm at a slow store and an MGT is needed in there about 3 hours out of every single day. I couldn't imagine how it is at a 24hr store. But its cool... I like working pharmacy and it allows me to expand my knowledge of how the company works.
Third, now they cut my hours. The 4 hours OT was not something "above and beyond" what we were promised. When I was hired I was told I would work AT LEAST 4 hours OT every week and that is just how it has been and will be.
Lastly, they ride our butts to increase sales and improve customer service ... yet I'm having to work more in Cos or Photo to cover for those hours. I'm having to work more stocking. I'm spending more time in the pharmacy. Yet, with all of this they want us to complete the same tasks, do the same quality of work, now in less amount of time.
I just feel cheated. I go into work every day and bust my butt to make my store nice. Yet at the same time there are Store Managers that just sit on their butt around the district and talk on the phone for half the day. There are EXAs who don't give a damn about the company and work only half as hard as many MGTs.
Now, I admit, there are a LOT of MGTs that don't hold their own weight. But there are also many of us who actually care and work hard and this is how we are repayed?
But Walgreens can pay these cards and get away with it. The job market isn't looking all that great. I have many friends that are graduating college and aren't able to find actual jobs. I graduated and went with Walgreens as a temporary gig and now I've made it something I want to pursue. But at this rate, they won't have many of the good employees around for long. There will be greener grass somewhere else at some point.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Carrie C. Posted Thu February 12, 2009 @ 9:04 PM
|
|
|
I too work for Walgreens, and I'm sorry but I feel no pity for you. The mgt team is now seeing how the other staff felt when our hours got cut. I make less than $10/ an hour and live paycheck to paycheck. I've worked for Walgreens for 4 years, and work just as hard as any manager in my store. I spend more time on the floor than I do in my own department, and don't get the pay. It's about time that Walgreens finally start cutting corporate and management hours. Think how much money they are saving by not paying $400 a month to every assitant manager in the company. That adds up to over 100 million dollars.
Reply
|
|

|
Re:
by sgtsharkey Thu February 12, 2009 @ 9:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Photoguy79 Posted Thu February 12, 2009 @ 8:32 PM
|
|
|
Oh cry a river for me please. The MGT makes a heck of a lot more than the other hourly employees in the store. Now with even more of the MGT duties being handed down to non-MGT such as returns and exchanges, why do they get paid so much more than anyone else. We also are the ones who deal with the customers first, and we deal with them ever day. Managers only come in after we have to catch the front of most all problems, and they step in and issue an apology and in some case a your right and we wrong with a side of a $20.00 W-card for your problems and they off to rebuild another end-stand. Most other companies would call what most MGT does a stocker. Then a few months ago when we all got our hours cut back oh some for or five hours a week did MGT care about that nope, because they was still getting there 44 hours a week. Now that they are cutting MGT hours and re budgeting the hours back to the other workers, all I have to say is boohoo..
Reply
|
|

|
Re:
by sgtsharkey Thu February 12, 2009 @ 9:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by sgtsharkey Posted Thu February 12, 2009 @ 7:40 PM
|
|
|
You definitly wrote this in the heat of the moment and there are commenters here who are not aware of the ongoings of a drug store -- especially Walgreens. To those people, the MGTs (Asst Managers) and EXAs are the VERY backbone of a store. If an MGT is in a store with a lazy store manager (a very common thing) they are much more of a backbone to that store. With the recent budget cuts in the stores you basically had the departments (cosmetics, photo lab) covered less than 100% of the time. There are hardly any hours for a floor person for stocking purposes and customer service. MGTs are called upon to cover some of these departments even with a full staff (no one calling in) along with doing just about everything imaginable in the store. We Assts weren't complaining about that. We excepted it although we didn't like it. Now comes the change in the promised 4 hours of overtime that Asst Managers have been getting for 30-40 years. They were hired with that promise.
It's bad everywhere and that's what Walgreens higherups are counting on -- there's no where for these Assts to go. But Walgreens better start counting on a much less motivated staff.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Final Score: Boys-3, Girls-1 Posted Thu February 12, 2009 @ 1:04 PM
|
|
|
I hope you find another job, and quickly. I'm afraid that once Walgreen's gets ahold of this letter, you may not have a job with them at all.
I know you are upset with them, but taking shots at your managers and the pharmacists that you work with isn't going to be taken well.
Reply
|
|

|
My guess..
by sgtsharkey Thu February 12, 2009 @ 7:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Thu February 12, 2009 @ 10:21 AM
|
|
|
if you hadn't decided to lead with your assertion that assistant managers are the most important people in the store. It's not that I disagree with you that you ought to be treated well by your employer; it's just that I disagree with you that you deserve it more than the people you work alongside but who have different job titles.
Even if it is true that you and the other assistant do the majority of the work in your store, I don't believe that it is true in all stores. And even if it were, customers -- and this is a site aimed at customers -- probably think pharmacists are more important than anybody else at a store like Walgreens, because there is little that an assistant manager can do that will have the kind of effect that medication errors do. (I almost never go into Walgreens any longer because of the incompetence of the pharmacists at the one near me; I doubt I would even know how to spot signs that the assistant managers are, or aren't, incompetent -- and I certainly don't think I would quit shopping at a store because the assistant managers in particular didn't do their jobs well.)
You don't get a whole lot of sympathy from me for not making as much money as you need when your hours are going to people who make less than you do, either. Don't they need money too? I'm not going to go so far as to suggest that you sound like a spoiled crybaby, any more than I would agree with you that well-trained professionals making $125,000 are spoiled crybabies, but it was a particularly jarring description for you to offer.
If you had written this letter to discuss the way all employees are being badly treated, or even if you'd focused on the plight of the assistant manager without showing such disrespect for your coworkers, it would have been a better letter.
Good luck finding a better job. But if you don't -- and I think it is possible that you will not -- good luck making the "hell hole" a better place to work. For all of you.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
They are not going to cut the Pharmacist's salary because there is a shortage of Pharmacists. Cut their salary and they will just go elsewhere.
Good luck finding that better job. Most places now are freezing new hires and asking employees to work for less. My employer tried but I was able to be exempt from it because I hadn't taken a pay raise in all the years I was with them. Others had to take a 10% pay cut.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Basically your letter is screaming what many employees, salaried or hourly, are feeling nowdays. Welcome to the reality.
Cutting back on OT is the first step in any company's decision to save money. If they give some OT to the hourly staff its still not costing them as much as it would for you being a manager. So yes, they are saving money.
Our hospital system is not giving raises this year in lieu of lay offs and they have a hiring freeze in effect.
As for the pharmacists these people went to school, got their degree and earned the right to make more money. If you had done that then you could be making what they are now.
Stop whining, pick yourself up and get back out there before there is nothing left to get.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by Adam W. Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 11:09 PM
|
|
|
Normally, I would come here and tell you that you shouldn't write a letter like this but I used to be a Walgreen's Assistant Manager and it was the worst job I've ever had. The only reason I kept it was for the pretty much unlimited overtime. I would quit in a second without the overtime. They work you like a dog. It's not worth it, even in these tough times.
Reply
|
|

|

|
Coming
by Wolf Thu February 12, 2009 @ 9:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Irving Patrick Freleigh Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 9:20 PM
|
|
|
Yeah, those "prima donna" pharmacists, they're good for nothing except getting the right drugs in the right dosages to the right patients, and informing patients of their proper use, so that the patients don't die. Who needs 'em.
If your bosses find this letter and identify you as the person who wrote it, you won't have to worry about guaranteed overtime any more.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by SueNY Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 8:39 PM
|
|
|
Ya know, maybe it's me, but in these tough times it just doesn't seem very smart to publically post a letter full of insults aimed at one's employer. You may just find out that losing OT is the least of your problems.
I understand your anger-my husband's company took away overtime too but he's just glad he still has job security and good benefits!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Helen K. Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 7:12 PM
|
|
|
Finally, and last for sure, I was not aware that your position in the company mattered MOST as your post title states. I think I'm pretty darn important too in what I do. I am on the front line daily greeting and accomodating customers.....Let's rethink this. Maybe we all contribute to the TEAM.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Helen K. Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 6:46 PM
|
|
|
And I add, Walgreens respects their employees. Imagine working for someone who threatened to break your fingers for changing the thermostat setting on the air or stomped on their speaker phone when the reception wasn't quite right. I have. Walgreens is great to work for.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Helen K. Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 6:33 PM
|
|
|
I work for Walgreens, I am hourly, I get paid for when I work. I struggle to survive on my less than $10/hr pay but am grateful for what I have. VERY grateful. Good luck in your job search...you're gonna need it.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by SusanB Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 12:11 PM
|
|
|
You still have a job, right? Millions of people would be thrilled with a pay cut vs. the position they are in now. Glass half full - - glass half empty - - count your blessings.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Donno Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 11:05 AM
|
|
|
that in these troubled times, 600,000 people a month losing jobs, that some people have larger problems such as losing *overtime* pay. The economy really is affecting everyone.
This really opens my eyes to the horror.
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
None of my lower management gets paid by the hour. They are all salary, and I will get a call monday morning from my DM if I use too much OT. We have never have guaranteed OT for anyone! It sounds like Walgreens is getting their business in line. OT is a major cost.
Do you know the schooling that a pharmacist has to go through. Did you know that the pharmacists have to carry the same insurance as a doctor?
In this economy you need to be thankful for having a job.
Good Day
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
As I recall from the news, Walgreens actually did get rid of about 9% of its corporate and field staff. That's a pretty big hit, especially if you're one of those guys that had their job eliminated.
My friend, you really need to take a look at the world around you. 34K folks lost their job at Circuit City. 7K just got eliminated at Macy's. The list goes on and on and on. The WAG comp sales are below what wall street is looking for, so the stock is sliding a bit (not dangerously low, but not setting the world on fire). You're not really going to convince the world to spend more money right now (even with $800 billion worth of whiz-bang government spending), so the only choice the company has to meet the bottom line numbers is to cut costs. It's not a move showing disrespect for any role -- it's a move to keep the company as healthy as possible in an economy which no one seems to know how to fix.
Overtime is a huge cost. While nobody likes the "do more with less" option, in a world where you are trying to keep from having to eliminate jobs, it's a very real option, and very, very necessary. You cut projects, you cut every bit of unneeded spending just to weather the storm.
Many companies have also canned merit increases and bonuses of any sort. In fact, many of us are just happy the light turns green when we put our badge to the door.
And if you really want a Pharmacist's salary, I suggest that you might want to get a pharmacists degree.
Best of luck. I know it's a hard pill to swallow, but I'll bet that when you wake up in a month and realize you have a job when another couple of hundred thousand folks have lost theirs, you might see things a bit differently.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by MA Cunningham Posted Wed February 11, 2009 @ 7:58 AM
|
|
|
I really do. There are a lot of good people getting jipped in this economy and it's not right.
HOWEVER, If you would like to STAY gainfully employed, I would never advocate posting an open letter on a public forum calling out colleagues and questioning senior management's decisions. (not to mention the implication of where you think their heads have been stuffed!)
I hope things get better for you and that you get through this unscathed, but I'd seriously rethink sharing this letter.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|