HOME SHARED LETTERS RATINGS MY PLANET COMMUNITIES MISSION SIGN UP!
Shared Letters

Join and browse our exclusive open discussion forums and talk about whatever you like.

Channels
» The Suggestion Box
» Company Responses
» PFB Feedback Line
» Consumer Podcasts
» Mommy Talk & Daddy Dialogue ™
» Shared Letters


Newsletter

Sign up for PlanetFeedback's "Consumer Café" email newsletter!





Clear Case of Discrimination at Walgreens

Posted Sun June 22, 2008 12:00 pm, by Shellie C. written to Walgreen's

Write a Letter to this Company  |  Rate this Company


My daughter and I went to Walgeens, 980 E Cypress Ave, Redding CA on Sunday 6/22/08. I had 6 coupons, 4 for $1 off any 2 Ragu, two register rewards for $5.50 off the next transaction and $5.00 off next transaction. Our cashier looked over my coupons and called the manager, with a question about usage. The manager stated I could only use one of the register rewards per transaction. He did not read the register rewards stating "number of manufactures coupons/register rewards can not exceed the number of items in the transaction", and when I tried to point this out to him, he stated "Don't take this personally, but some customers come in here to use coupons to defraud the store, we train our cashier to listen to the managers, not the customers.". He never did read the register reward.

My daughter (age 23) then made her purchase, using the exact same coupons I had used. My daughter and I went to the car, unloaded our bags, and were ready to pull away when the manager approached us, and stated that obviously the cashier did not listen to him, and that I was not allowed to shop at this location. I was fuming and stated the cashier did exactly what he told her to, and did not allow more than one register reward per transaction. He kept repeating "in the spirit of the coupon", and when I again attempted to show him the wording on the register reward, he stated "in the spirit of the coupon, you can only use one, only one".

I left, pulling into another stores parking lot, calmed down somewhat and called 1800-walgreens and left a message. I then called the Cypress store to speak to the manager. I gave him my name, correctly spelling my first name as it is unusual and told him that I have approximately 8 prescriptions a month filled at this location and would be transfering them, as I was no longer allowed at this location. He made a comment about welfare benefits, I stated that I have private insurance and it pays over $1000 a month to fill my prescriptions. He then backpedaled by saying that filling prescriptions was different, he didn't mean that I could not come back to the store, I just couldn't use my coupons there. He then stated this conversation was over, as there was nothing more to discuss. I asked him if he was going to hang up on me. He did hang up.

I feel this is a very clear case of discrimination, first with the comment about coupon fraud, then about government benefits. His preconceived opinion of someone using coupons has to be on welfare, is definitely not the image that Walgreens is trying to convey. Walgreens tries very hard to lure customers, by offering register rewards and has a very liberal coupon policy of allowing store coupons in conjunction with manufactures coupons. I would appreciate an apology from the manager, with retraining on coupon usage, what correct usage of register rewards is and how to treat customers. I would also like permission to continue shopping at this location. I do not understand as to where the manager got the statement of "in the spirit of the coupon" from, but I read what is written. I also wanted to say that the cashier was very pleasant, but had to follow what the manager told her.


Reply



Log In/Create an account | 31 comments
     Add to your del.icio.us  del.icio.us    Digg this story  Digg this  
PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately.
by tiffborchardt Posted Tue February 3, 2009 @ 6:08 AM

You should not take this so personally. The Walgreens register rewards
coupons have cost Walgreens a ton of personnel. Stores across the
country fired tons and tons of cashiers for using the register reward
coupons duplicitly. If you think they treated you, the customer like
crap, you should see how they treat some of their longstanding help
and some of their help. Of course you have probably noticed the
psychotic turnover at your local Walgreens.

Reply
by thebaddawg Posted Fri August 1, 2008 @ 4:24 PM

not getting your way is not the same thing as discrimination.

Reply
by KJCat Posted Tue June 24, 2008 @ 4:54 PM

This is not discrimination. It is a coupon policy, plain and simple.

Reply

by Timothy C. Posted Tue June 24, 2008 @ 10:55 AM

Imagine how I felt being told that I could not have a job for which I
was otherwise qualified because I had visible tattoos on my arms? I
called the ACLU among others and always got the same response;

I'll never forget that. Discrimination is based on only 8 major
areas! Imagine that. Just because someone refuses to honor coupons
because they feel people abuse them is not discrimination! Asking
about welfare is not discrimination, acting on it or denying you
something because you are on it is. hmmm go figure. He did not deny
your coupon based on the fact you are on welfare did he? No. He did
state "IN THE SPIRIT OF THE COUPON" and I'm sure you broke the spirit
by using two people and two coupons...sneaky, very sneaky! You knew
how to get over on that system real quick on the spot huh? To me you
broke the spirit and intention...I personally would have run you out
of the store. Managers or stores have the discretion of NOT honoring
anything in thier stores...UNLESS they are being discrimintory, which
they weren't. Don't shop there anymore. Here is the definition of
DISCRIMINATION;

Unlawful discrimination can be characterized as direct or subtle.
Direct discrimination involves treating someone less favorably because
of their possession of an attribute (e.g., sex, age, race, religion,
family status, national origin, military status, disability), compared
with someone without that attribute in the same circumstances. An
example of direct discrimination would be not offering a job to a
woman because she is likely to take maternity leave whereas a man is
not. Indirect or subtle discrimination involves setting a condition or
requirement which a smaller proportion of those with the attribute are
able to comply with, without reasonable justification. The U.S. case
of Griggs v. Duke Power Company[2] provides an example of indirect
discrimination, where an aptitude test used in job applications was
found "to disqualify Negroes at a substantially higher rate than white
applicants".

My wish is people will quit using the term DISCRIMINATION for things
they are refused without knowing truly what discrimination is!

Reply

Not discrimination by KJCat Tue June 24, 2008 @ 5:00 PM

I know...and I'm not the OP or the one complaining!!! Just a commentor like you! by Timothy C. Wed June 25, 2008 @ 12:51 AM


Timothy, by Just Brenda Wed June 25, 2008 @ 8:16 AM

BTW KJCat.... by Timothy C. Wed June 25, 2008 @ 1:02 AM

here we go... by KJCat Wed June 25, 2008 @ 11:05 AM

Give me a break by Left Field Wed June 25, 2008 @ 10:17 PM
by Heather F. Posted Mon June 23, 2008 @ 9:03 PM

I have never been allowed to use more than one of the catalina coupons
during a shopping trip at any Walgreens store. I have been told many,
many, many times that the rule is one catalina coupon per shopping
trip.

Reply


I believe it can be done, but you are supposed to ask store management (which is what the OP did!) by Donno Mon June 23, 2008 @ 11:25 PM

reply by Heather F. Tue June 24, 2008 @ 5:26 PM


I'm with you by Donno Tue June 24, 2008 @ 8:07 PM

by Harleycat (aka Usual Suspect #2) Posted Mon June 23, 2008 @ 11:12 AM

Discrimination? No, poor service, plain and simple.

Reply


The letter says the next shopper used the same coupons - and was fine by The Original Nethead Mon June 23, 2008 @ 1:15 PM


by RedheadwGlasses Posted Mon June 23, 2008 @ 8:53 AM

This likely isn't discrimination, just another store employee and
manager who doesn't understand how coupons are supposed to work.
There are letters here all the time about this problem. People who
aren't on government assistance get the same hassles.

Reply

by Donno Posted Sun June 22, 2008 @ 7:57 PM

He said "don't take it personally," but it sounds like you did. The
main issue in this letter is how the coupons are redeemed. You
brought in this discrimination business, but it isn't clear how it
came up or fits. As far as welfare, I don't see exactly when that
came up or in what context. It was somewhere in a discussion of
prescriptions, which is a separate issue. I think you should
concentrate on challenging the coupon policy and not throw out the
discrimination charge.

Register Rewards are "very complicated" (according to the Savvy
Shopper at SavvyShpperDeals), and it would take 5 minutes for someone
who knows (not I) to explain how they work. I think there is a
Walgreen's employee here who can help explain.

Are these RR coupons for specific items or a specific brand? If so,
I'm not sure you can combine them.

They may have a liberal policy, but it has rules and they don't give
stuff away. I would expect the manager to know them. It would be
interesting to know exactly what the coupons were for and what the
fine print said.

On the subject of banning you from the store, they can do that but the
discussion that led to that was not included in the letter. It was
like "Oh, by the way, I said you can't shop here." They usually don't
do that unless something bad occurred.

I'm afraid this complaint is as complicated as the Register Rewards
program.

Reply

rebuttal by Shellie C. Sun June 22, 2008 @ 10:20 PM


With all those assets, why are you on government assistance? by RedheadwGlasses Mon June 23, 2008 @ 12:37 PM


Where does it say by Harleycat (aka Usual Suspect #2) Mon June 23, 2008 @ 1:21 PM

She was treated poorly, that's for sure! by wendy1214 Mon June 23, 2008 @ 1:25 PM


I agree by Teresa B. Mon June 23, 2008 @ 3:10 PM


Thank you! by RedheadwGlasses Mon June 23, 2008 @ 10:06 PM


she is employed by SuzieCat Mon June 23, 2008 @ 4:38 PM


I agree by RedheadwGlasses Tue June 24, 2008 @ 9:07 AM


Shellie by Just Brenda Mon June 23, 2008 @ 7:28 PM


She is saving serious bucks by RedheadwGlasses Mon June 23, 2008 @ 10:11 PM


I wonder if she would give lessons by Teresa B. Tue June 24, 2008 @ 6:18 PM


There are books on this by RedheadwGlasses Tue June 24, 2008 @ 9:47 PM


I've been doing it for 25 years by ♪♪Venice♪♪ Tue June 24, 2008 @ 9:57 PM




Home | Shared Letters | Ratings | Login | Communities | Categories | RSS | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | FAQ
Copyright 2010 © All Rights Reserved PlanetFeedback.com | Web by Cicada