 |
|
by wkiddnbama Posted Sun November 22, 2009 @ 10:53 AM
|
|
|
Hello--I'm too a victim of this, but a much more extreme case--I finally got fed up with them. About a year ago I went to buy a bottle of wine with my groceries and my youngest was helpin unload groceries and touched the wine. Then they couldn't sell it to me. Of course I got mad and retaliated, but I just got the rest of my stuff and came in later to get it by myself. Well, I had no clue that Walmart's policy (which is currently being investigated) is that an adult can't even buy it in the PRESENCE OF A CHILD. A few days ago I went to buy wine with my 21 year old son (I'm 40) and he didn't have his id on him (picture) anyway because he was in the process of updating from SC to Al since he moved back with us. They denied it to me just because he didn't have an ID. I felt soo personally discriminated against since I was just in a week ago and bough wine with my younger girls and there wasn't a problem. That's when I proceeded to say that it must be a "backwards-country-****Christian religious conspiracy!" and I called the police to verify his age, but it backfired on me. By the time the police got there, I've had ugly words with the managers whom want to ban me from Walmarts all over Alabama. I was in no way violent and the cop got mad and took his anger out on me--slammed me up against the window so hard that it almost fell out and the manager had to push the window back up. I asked the cop why did he get violent when I was willing to go to jail over this ridiculous policy? HE DIDN'T HAVE AN ANSWER. He was probably worried that I would sue him for HIS CONDUCT. Well, now I have to go to court on Jan. 21st here in Wetumpka, Al to see if I just have to pay a fine, or go to jail. My husband has since posted my bond which was $500 (he didn't actually pay anything-he put a lean on our home). I am guilty of disorderly conduct--but I was in no way violent. I was just offending people with what I was saying. I'm a sensetive person and took this to heart, but I really think that Walmart's policy is an invasion of personal privacy. How is it Walmart's responsibility that someone drinks underage? How can they play God?? I never would've guessed that you couldn't buy alcohol in the presence of a minor. Everywhere else you can. How could I not think this wasn't a Southern Christian Conspiracy? I know I may sound exteme, but really this is ridiculous!!!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by mallman Posted Sat August 22, 2009 @ 9:48 PM
|
|
|
my boyfriend and my dtr 16 just went thru checkout line - self pay and when my 16 year old went to swipe the card -- after I had already been verified as adult over 21 (i'm 36)---they then refused to sell the alcohol which was fine, but then they decided to not let me go back thru the line for the alcohol purchase by myself and they also held onto my card-- in my name that my dtr was just helping me by swiping and stated that she could not even push the cart with alcohol in it. we were just letting her slide the card with my name on it, just to help-- in no way was i contributing to an alcohol purchase for her, it didn't even cross my mind. She then completed the transaction of the alcohol and other misc items and signed at the bottom of the receipt- "underage purchase" and then rang up the other items minus the wine and then let me sign for the purchase. now both the purchases are shoeing on my acct. one with the wine and other items and one without the wine bbut with the other items. so, we were charged for the wine, but didn't get to leave the store with it and then in essence we were double charged for the other misc items we had purchased. We are currently awaiting return call from corporate. she in essence did complete an underage sell by charging our card-- if that is what she think was going on -since she signed where my signature goes "underage sale" and charge my bank account-- did she do something illegal by completing this transaction if she thought it was a third party purchase for alcohol???if it would have been cigarrettes, would it be the same, if i would allow my 6 yr old just wipe the card to help would it still be an underage sell???-- it's frustrating because they even told me i was not allowed to come back and purchase alcohol until the next day. I understand them trying to cut down on underage purchases, but this is riduculous and their attitude towards me here in south carolina was ridiculous-- like i was a criminal-- so, I guess a child--even a teenager is not allowed to push a cart with alcohol, or slide the card in their moms name while in self checkout for the parent when there is alcohol involved. Pretty sad that they completed the transaction and charged my acct and i didn't get to leave with my bottle of wine. Guess I'm getting a little educatin on alcohol purchases here and how walmart deals with the public-- it was quite embarrassing for the guests behind me to see it unfold as I would never purchase or let my 16 yr old purchase the alcohol for her consumption. I did get my card back in the end but only after i had to use some words that I normally wouldn't say...
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by kadyalexander Posted Wed February 25, 2009 @ 12:09 AM
|
|
|
This just happened to me and my husband about an hour ago. We are both 30 years old. I had forgotten my wallet at home. We currently live in Iowa which allows parents to serve their children. The cashier and the manager told us that it was because of third party sales to minors. We are still fuming mad! I even was getting ready to leave so that he could make the purchase but they said they still would not sell it to him. They also said it was because it is a college town, however, we are originally from a college town that has no problems with selling alcohol to parties where not everyone has ID's. I even asked if it was a policy or if it was a law and was told it was a policy. We do most of our shopping at Wal-Mart but have started to rethink this. I have read a similiar blog to this and apparently this stupid policy has made the rounds to several Wal-Marts. If they have policies where it is harder for people to make legal purchases but the store a few blocks down doesn't, who are they potecting? I have worked for an attorney in the past and I really doubt they would not be liable by law for third party sales.
Reply
|
|

|
correction -
by kadyalexander Wed February 25, 2009 @ 12:15 AM
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
by Marty5223 Posted Thu February 5, 2009 @ 12:46 PM
|
|
|
I agree this is a dumb policy. However how if your children are underage is it legal for HIM to serve them at HOME????
Reply
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by mtopi Posted Wed January 21, 2009 @ 6:31 PM
|
|
|
The whole idea is stupid beyond belief.
First, it is easier in this country for a kid to buy an automatic weapon than it is for him to buy a beer.
Second, is a single mother with kids who wants relief from stress by purchasing a aix-pack supposed to let the kids alone, locked in the car witht the windows up on a hot day or alone at home to get into trouble, both of which are also illegal?
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by charlene m. Posted Sat January 17, 2009 @ 11:57 PM
|
|
|
soooo what you r saying is that if a father buys beer with their 2 sons drinks on the way home gets in a wreck and kills the 2 boys and the single mother driving the other car then the cashier gets aressted because she did not id everyone in the party thats ok?? thats why we id everyone to protect you, me, and your family and no im not saying he would do that but that is why the rule is place..... but thats just the crazy way walmart work we like to mess up your whole day but yet you keep coming back and spending your time and money to buy things and to make yourself feel better
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
well
by charlene m. Tue January 20, 2009 @ 1:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
by Adam W. Posted Wed January 14, 2009 @ 6:36 AM
|
|
|
I've had this problem too. They wouldn't let me purchase beer with a 16 year old next to me but they had no problem selling it to me when I had a 6 year old next to me. Go figure....
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by txladi29 Posted Fri January 9, 2009 @ 2:45 PM
|
|
|
That is ridiculous....guess they are going to lose some gusiness. In Texas the law states that minors can't contribute to the purchase, but they can accompany an adult while the adult purchases.
In my opinion, the "bad apple" population that has turned sue happy over the past century, has ruined it for us all.
Cheers!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by bandita Posted Fri January 9, 2009 @ 11:22 AM
|
|
|
Isn't this like, a liability issue? If you give your teens booze that you bought while you were with them at the store, and they got into a drunk driving accident, the store can get sued, or something.
BTW, everyone's saying its legal to serve kids booze. Yeah, but why do you want to get your kids liquored up in the first place? Better prepare them for Youth AA.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Here in NJ Walmart doesn't sell liquor/alcohol, neither does Wawa or Seven Eleven and so on. You have to go to a liquor store for anything.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Chris G. Posted Tue January 6, 2009 @ 1:27 PM
|
|
|
Seems that WalMart just wants to keep all of their bases covered so that they don't get in trouble with the law and have to pay the penalty. A strict store policy ensures that it will be unlikely they will get a fine for having one of their cashier minions slip up by not following the procedure. It's all about saving $.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Unless this is a law in your state Walmart should not be asking their customers to do this.
However, if it is then they are well within their right to enforce it.
Ohio has no law like this...anyone of legal age can purchase beer/alcohol no matter if they are with underaged persons or not.
And as far as your claim that its legal to supply beer to your child at home there are many counties/cities who have their own laws regarding this. Just because one wants to be cool with their kids does not mean they should allow them to drink. Sadly more communites/states should have this law.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Anonymous A. Posted Mon January 5, 2009 @ 6:50 AM
|
|
|
BTW,I forgot to clarify that its not just a Walmart rule, but it is indeed a law. working at a grocery store in the past, we were told we had to card EVERYONE in the party who was buying the alcohol,regardless if they werent teh ones paying. Had there been an undercover cop, they would bust you for it. Its s law in every place, its just the fact that no one really enforces it. I guess they dont care to risk their jobs.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
hmm..
by Anonymous A. Thu January 8, 2009 @ 5:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Anonymous A. Posted Mon January 5, 2009 @ 6:45 AM
|
|
|
this is not a policy..this is a LAW! You or your husband do not have special law privileges over any one else, regardless if you have your children with you when attempting to purchase alcohol.The reason for this law is if any alcohol is given to a minor (regardless if someone is of legal age who bought it) from the person legal of age, if that child is physically hurt and has proof that they were drinking and that the drinking caused the accident, the clerk who sold it to the legal customer could be sued personally and thrown in jail, not to mention lose his or her job! Having children present only contributes to suspicion of underage drinking. Personally, Being in retail, I know feeding my family is much more important than some stranger's booze fix! I hope you understand the consequences now,and that other people also have families to feed.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
Cool...
by Anonymous A. Thu January 8, 2009 @ 5:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
by Rated Argh Posted Sun January 4, 2009 @ 5:14 PM
|
|
|
I believe that this may actually be a Wal-mart Policy that just isn't enforced across the board. I have one wal-mart in my town that follows this exact policy and one that doesn't. it just seems to be up to the individual store on how to handle it. There is also a trend I'm seeing where these stores all have a separate little "Store-Area", for lack of a better name, where all hard Liquor is sold separate from all other merchandise.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by Wolf Posted Sun January 4, 2009 @ 3:35 PM
|
|
|
Anyone stop to think that MAYBE this ONE store has had a problem in the past where people were buying alcohol for under age kids, so they felt this policy was the best way to stop it? I can see that happening. Have you checked other Walmarts? Is it really just this one? If it is, then I would think that there was something that caused this store to implement the policy. It may just be easier to say "All must have ID and be 21" then to pick and choose. If you "pick and choose" you run the risk of the person behind some one that got pasted the policy, complaining that THEY didn't get the pass. See where I am going?
If your husband goes back and wants to but alcohol there again, DON'T have your kids stand in line with him. They are old enough to wait right outside the door. Or have then go to the bathroom or something.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
If this manager were in Wisconsin, he'd have some explaining to do because the law doesn't support his cause. In Wisconsin, it is perfectly legal for a parent to serve alcohol to a child. (See my post below.)
Personally, I think this is a ridiculous policy too.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
by Melissa J. Posted Sun January 4, 2009 @ 1:35 PM
|
|
|
While I do understand why you would be upset because if I where in that situation I would most likely have been upset also.I can also understand why the cashier did that,there are alot of people out there that do buy alcohol for minor children being parent or someone eles.If something was to happen to anyone and they knowingly sold them alcohol they will be held responsible.I am a disrict manager for a retail chain and I know what the consequences are.I had a great employee who was with me for 5 years,two older looking gentlemen came in and bought beer,she did card them but come tp find out it was a sting operation done by the police.They had fake I.D's.The police had made them so real that to be honest you would not know,it was there picture and everything that to me just isn't fair.I had to fire her I have no choice.This poor girl was arrested,fired,fined and had to pay bond all in the same night.To me this should be illegal.Honest people working and being set up it's not right.So I can totally understand why the cashier was that way,alot of things can happen that just aren't worth it,while I understand your situation because I have been there I also know it is there job and there lives that will be affected.I hope you also realize that it is illegal for anyone even a parent to serve a minor child alcohol at anytime and anyplace,you can and will be arrested for child neglect and endangerment.I hope you can understnd why the sales people act the way they do when it comes to alcohol,it isn't them you should be upset with it is the people who make the laws.They are just trying to keep there jobs and stay out of jail. Please try not to be upset with the people who serve you.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by MayDay Posted Sun January 4, 2009 @ 9:58 AM
|
|
|
I live in PA where you can only buy beer/liquor in a state store or beer distributor. It is also illegal in PA to serve minors alcohol. I know of several cases around where minors were at a party and got into an accident on the way home and hurt/killed another driver. The adults at the party were also charged in the crime even though they were not driving the car.
The stores here can ID people if they look under 40 to buy cigarettes! A policy is a policy, leave the teens in the car then go in and buy the beer if the need be. If the kids are not teens and cannot be alone, I guess a special trip without them would be needed.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by SuzieCat Posted Sun January 4, 2009 @ 9:58 AM
|
|
|
Here in Ohio, a lot of places have signs up saying if you are buying alcohol, EVERY person in your party must show ID.
I have never seen those signs in stores that sell groceries, though. In fact, the woman in front of me at Miejer the other day had her two kids with her and she bought wine and beer.
I wonder, are the kids older teenagers? Maybe the clerk was erring on the side of caution. If so, I agree, a manager should have been able to override the decision.
I cant imagine them refusing to sell alcohol in a walmart, target, etc when, say someone is doing their weekly shopping and has their kids with her.
Reply
|
|

|
ID
by me&you Sun January 4, 2009 @ 3:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I agree 100%!!!!!!!
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Kelshir Posted Sat January 3, 2009 @ 11:30 PM
|
|
|
The only reason I can think of this happening might be because the manager did not believe they were his children and thought he was buying them alcohol.
I know that in Texas it is legal for a parent or legal guardian to give alcohol to their children. Can even do so in a restaurant so long as the child drinks from the parents/legal guardians glass and not their own.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Retail Veteran Posted Sat January 3, 2009 @ 7:07 PM
|
|
|
Actually, it is illegal for a minor to possess alcohol regardless of where and from whom they obtained it. Wal-Mart is correct in not selling your husband beer when he had minors with him. They don't know if they are his children or not and if he is buying the beer for them. Believe it or not, it is pretty common for minors to get adults to purchase alcohol for them. Next time, have your husband go by himself to buy his beer.
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|