|
|
Overdraft fees
Posted Sun March 2, 2008 12:07 pm, by Jeanne D. written to Wells Fargo
Write a Letter to this Company | Rate this Company
Wells Fargo have held off depositing my pay check in order to collect overdraft fees.
Wells Fargo debit larger checks before smaller ones that are drawn on the account in the same period. Doing so assures that a larger number of checks bounce if I have insufficient funds, resulting in more fees for the bank.
I would like the bank to reimburse all the fees that was wrongfully charged. Fees totalling $1000 over the years.
Reply
| Log In/Create an account | 17 comments |
|
|
| PlanetFeedback Comments are subject to strict terms and conditions. We reserve the right to deny site membership privileges to any individuals acting inappropriately. |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
by justforlaughs Posted Wed March 5, 2008 @ 2:12 PM
|
|
|
I always say this, and I will say it again. If you cannot keep track of your bank account to the point of having overdraft fees totaling to $1000 over the years, why do you even have an account?
This really is your fault, and you shouldn't spend money that you don't have! If you only spent money that you had, it wouldn't matter in which order the bank draws the money from your account, because it wouldn't overdraw you each time!
They will not give you those fees back. Why should they? If it was a mistake and it happened only once or twice, yes I could see that happening. But for someone who does it over and over again? I don't think so! Either start keeping better track of your account, or don't have one at all. You are only wasting your money, and they are making money from you. I can't say that I blame them.
I can't believe that you would sit and write something like this when you are clearly in the wrong.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
by Bethr96 Posted Wed March 5, 2008 @ 12:20 PM
|
|
|
There is not one bank that doesn't do this. I am so tired of overdraft fees..my bank holds my direct deposit in pending for two days before adding it even though they say it is available. The government has to do something about banks doing this.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
At this point with so many fees being charged to you, I would recommend changing your method of using their services or bank where they do not use that policy.
Reply
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
by Angelic Princess:) Posted Tue March 4, 2008 @ 6:46 PM
|
|
|
"over the years".... and you just now care...... WOW
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|

|
by BellaSera Posted Tue March 4, 2008 @ 12:48 PM
|
|
|
The practice of putting through larger checks before smaller ones, regardless of date, is a common one because yes, it garners more fees for the bank. While I've voiced my disagreement of this in the past, many states still allow this practice. If it's legal in your state (and it probably is), then you need to be extra vigilant in ensuring your account doesn't go into overdraft.
While I might've been on your side had this been one or two checks (a lot of banks will waive the overdraft fee if it's the first time you've ever bounced a check or haven't done so in quite awhile), $1000 in overdraft fees means quite a few bounced checks. How many years are you talking about it? You may need more than a reimbursement of fees; you may actually need help in money management.
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
by Dru Posted Mon March 3, 2008 @ 8:45 PM
|
|
|
I am not surprised about this complaint. The company I work for makes cash deposits every Friday, and the money isn't posted until Tuesday or Wednesday of the next week. I can understand when we deposit after the "cut-off" time, that it should post the following business day, usually Monday. But up to 5 or 6 days later? We've even had one cash deposit not post until after the following weeks deposit. I will never bank with Wells Fargo for my personal accounts, and my boss is researching other banks to transfer all his company business to.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by Adam D Posted Mon March 3, 2008 @ 6:38 PM
|
|
|
$1,000.00 over the years? You say that so casually. Sorry, but it's not the bank, its your lack of financial responsibility. And if it IS the bank, and this has been happening for years, well then I don't need to state the obvious!
Reply
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Have they been delaying the deposit of pay checks? By how many days?
2, 3, 4, or ever 5 days may be reasonable to credit a deposit. While we'd like it to be quicker, banks are unfront about the fact that it can take a few days to credit a deposit.
If they're holding your checks for 10 days, that's excessive and you need to find out why.
This said, never write a check that there's not money in your account to cover. Not pending deposits, but actual money in the account.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
by SusanB Posted Mon March 3, 2008 @ 11:41 AM
|
|
|
If you are maintaining an accurate check register and not authorizing debits (either via check or ATM) prior to your funds being available, then it shouldn't matter what order the debits post.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|

|
|
|
 |
|

|
by Gino Posted Mon March 3, 2008 @ 1:45 AM
|
|
|
The bank, in this case, didn't wrongfully charge this fee. If the money isn't in the account, they charge a fee for using their money to cover your shortage.
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
|
If you have enough in your account to begin with then it shouldn't matter what order they come in. Don't spend what you don't have and keep a check register properly, and you shouldn't have any problems.
Reply
|
|
 |
|

|
by calm Posted Sun March 2, 2008 @ 3:04 PM
|
|
|
They've held off depositing your paycheck in order to collect overdraft fees? Or have you started writing checks as soon as you give them the paycheck rather than waiting for it to clear?
The problem is that you've agreed to their terms, which includes agreeing that they can charge you these overdraft fees -- so they haven't been wrongfully charged. I'm not sure why, well before you had paid $1,000, you didn't look at your own actions and figure out how to behave so that you didn't keep getting hit with the fees.
Reply
|
|
|
 |
|
|